Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.
Date: Thu, 29 May 2025 22:57:45 +0000
Organization: novaBBS
Message-ID: <83ff6b68dc4bb08baa04d9b476b0d330@www.novabbs.com>
References: <bee82c477b86c0caf1c30da405ed870f@www.novabbs.com> <10140pm$2huu3$1@dont-email.me> <211597acf09cc21af2125ea3c9fe12d4@www.novabbs.com> <101acbb$188t$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="2479144"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="HcQFdl4zp4UQRQ9N18ivMn6Fl9V8n4SPkK4oZHLgYdQ";
User-Agent: Rocksolid Light
X-Rslight-Posting-User: a2f761a7401f13abeefca3440f16b2f27b708180
X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$ysnh6a3Qf3.BwuZxxdbbuewBgtHAEKMZjQAfr.X8sWdmDPMPFXebS
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0

On Thu, 29 May 2025 19:31:57 +0000, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:

> Den 27.05.2025 17:49, skrev LaurenceClarkCrossen:
>> On Tue, 27 May 2025 9:37:57 +0000, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:
>>
>>> Den 27.05.2025 05:27, skrev LaurenceClarkCrossen:
>>>> Particle wave duality is no longer accepted as it has been
>>>> experimentally disproven.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Did We Get the Double Slit Experiment All Wrong?"
>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DpMcC-E5l5c
>
> The first few statements spoken in the video are:
>
> "Did we misunderstand the double slit experiment,
>   the most famous experiment in quantum physics?
>   We usually interpret it as proof that light is both
>   a particle and a wave, the essence of quantum physics.
>   Yet in a new paper, a group of physicist disagree.
>   It can all be explained by particles, they say."
>
> Repeat: "It can all be explained by particles."
>
> This is what you seem to believe was said in the video:
>
>>>>
>>>> Light is a wave and not a particle.
>
> That's was why I wrote:
>
>>>
>>> Got it upside down and inside out again, Laurence? :-D
>
>> You do not even attempt to be persuasive.
>
> I am not trying to convince you about anything.
>
>
> Your question to the AI:
>
>> "Why do Physicists talk about Wave Particle Duality?
>
> The AI answer:
>
>> The
>> truth is most professional physicists don’t talk about wave particle
>> duality, and it is a dying concept.
>   ..
>> In modern textbooks of quantum mechanics and quantum
>> field theory, talk of wave-particle duality is absent.
>
> According to the modern relativistic quantum field theory QED,
> light is a particle.
>
>
> This is how Laurence Clark Crossen has interpreted the video
> and the AI answer:
>
>> Wave particle duality is not real. It's been invalidated by experiments
>> so light must be a wave.
>
> Still got it backwards and upside down and inside out, Laurence? :-D
They failed to reduce it to a particle. Still presuming what you want to
conclude Paul?