Path: ...!news.tomockey.net!news.samoylyk.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: Albert in Relativityland
Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2025 21:06:22 +0000
Organization: novaBBS
Message-ID: <84672d1fe0950fcbe78b9b715e261671@www.novabbs.com>
References: <3ce0bf632f46843f8cc0a3f45fdc0acd@www.novabbs.com> <vshcgq$3ojsg$3@dont-email.me> <795a3195162645246d7e9e786d2036ff@www.novabbs.com> <vsiuqq$1bsmo$2@dont-email.me> <d0be5ca5054bb07de26f5d86274ce629@www.novabbs.com> <vsliu4$52m4$4@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="3004495"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="HcQFdl4zp4UQRQ9N18ivMn6Fl9V8n4SPkK4oZHLgYdQ";
User-Agent: Rocksolid Light
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
X-Rslight-Posting-User: a2f761a7401f13abeefca3440f16b2f27b708180
X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$V92rBCZI0LlUfOoljfkLYeTNr3meTSE3z/c2eS1Pa4uNYJwqd7eqq
Bytes: 3017
Lines: 56

On Thu, 3 Apr 2025 9:08:46 +0000, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:

> Den 02.04.2025 20:25, skrev LaurenceClarkCrossen:
>> On Wed, 2 Apr 2025 9:13:22 +0000, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:
>>
>>> Den 01.04.2025 21:28, skrev LaurenceClarkCrossen:
>>>> Relativity is so fallacious that a person with only knowledge of
>>>> elementary logic and an 85 I.Q. is qualified to refute it.
>
>>>
>>> Is it because of your  85 I.Q. and knowledge of elementary
>>> logic that your comment to my statement:
>>>
>>> "The speed of muons is v = ~ 0.999668⋅c through the atmosphere
>>>   which also is within the laboratory with open roof."
>>>
>>> was:
>>>
>>>   "THEN, the time dilation must be the same." ?
>
> How slow is it possible to be? :-D
>
> My statement was:
> "There is but one speed v = ~ 0.999668⋅c"
>
> your response was:
>   "THEN, the time dilation must be the same."
>
> GET this: The statement:
> "When an object has a speed v, then time dilation must be the same"
>
> is an idiotic, nonsensical, meaningless, stupid response.
>
>
>
>> Paul, the math does not cause time dilation. When the speed is the same
>> in both places, what is the cause? You have no idea
>
> And you repeat your nonsensical statement yet again!
>
>
> The measured mean lifetime of a stationary muon is 2.2 μs
> The measured mean lifetime of a muon moving at 0.999668⋅c is 85.36 μs.
>
> These are measured facts, not math.
>
> Can you give another interpretation of the facts than "time dilation"?
>
>
I did not say the time dilation must be the same for the same speed.
I asked why relativity says it's different.
What is the alleged cause?
When are you going to try to understand?
Time dilation is not a difference in lifetime.
I never denied the measured lifetimes.
I only disagreed with your interpretation that it is time dilation.
They just live longer. But why?