Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: nnymous109@gmail.com (nnymous109)
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Yet another contribution to the P-NP question
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2024 00:04:41 +0000
Organization: RetroBBS
Message-ID: <85955d539da522cf777ab489101c0e2a@www.rocksolidbbs.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="3499406"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="rrhMWBcDAx1rC5+om1CWMH+W6SvwsR4AkzPL9w80GDY";
User-Agent: Rocksolid Light
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
X-Rslight-Posting-User: 997a80a59f36bca0d6daf54c90c3284ff767f4d5
X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$1.yQtMeMBWcKxrtcZKWGHOg.oOqZ/RkUWsxpl3gTpi073TkOPDPU.
Bytes: 1862
Lines: 18

I know the reputation that claims like these get, so I promise, I didn't
want to do this. But I've spent quite some time working on this document
that I feel it would be a shame if I didn't, at least, get it
criticized.

As you can probably tell, I have little formal education in Math or
Computer Science (though I would really like some), so I am not very
confident in the argument I have come up with. I also haven't been able
to get someone else to review the work and give feedback, so there might
be obvious flaws that   I have not picked up on because they have
remained in my blind spots.

In the best case, this may still be work in progress, so I will be
thankful for any comments you will have for me. However, in the more
than likely scenario that the argument is fundamentally flawed and
cannot be rescued, I apologize beforehand for having wasted your time.

I have placed the document in a Figshare project, and here is the DOI:
10.6084/m9.figshare.27106759