Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<85ecaea05c5db4ee1effffae2c29a65b@www.novabbs.org>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.quux.org!news.nk.ca!rocksolid2!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: New addition to the List of Critics of Relativity
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2025 03:00:26 +0000
Organization: Rocksolid Light
Message-ID: <85ecaea05c5db4ee1effffae2c29a65b@www.novabbs.org>
References: <1rdrgli.1awgoez1fu6irjN%nospam@de-ster.demon.nl> <102c8iu$22g5j$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="137233"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="8Ljlg8xw5cAHatvjdHGGjEHKUx9ddlqxMwQzk4UFm4k";
User-Agent: Rocksolid Light
X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$xmveerBk8STtnebNV0C.beWamht3sL7/Jg3g22xx/FNk0N9IKvZ4G
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
X-Rslight-Posting-User: d6bc49351b0faa08a25d2b434d815198335a8b45

On Wed, 11 Jun 2025 15:49:50 +0000, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote:

> On 2025-06-11 09:35:53 +0000, J. J. Lodder said:
>
>> LaurenceClarkCrossen <clzb93ynxj@att.net> wrote:
>>
>>> Darrell Bender New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology
>>>
>>> Bender, D. (2025). "The Dying of a Principle: The Bending of Light, the
>>> Oppenheimer-Snyder Gravitational Contraction, and the Postulate of
>>> Relativity"
>>> European Journal of Applied Sciences, Vol. 13(02). 505-546.
>>>
>>> "Considering Einstein's relativity theories, which we have repeatedly
>>> shown to be blatantly false, and the constant stream of corruption,
>>> misinformation, propaganda, and lies supporting them by the institutions
>>> with big names and the physicists themselves with even bigger names, if
>>> that be possible, than the institutions. The fraud emanates from the
>>> top."
>>
>> Have you actually looked at this 'journal'?
>
> I hadn't previously, but I have now. Any journal that announces itself
> as a "peer-reviewed open access online journal" is showing two red
> flags right there. Anyay, the content is what one would expect. Serious
> journals don't say they're peer reviewed because that's assumed; some
> respectable journals have open access but "open access" is no guarantee.

And you cannot be a peer unless you are a deep devotee of relativity,
quantum and thermodynamics. In short, an anti-Science entity.

Sad.

WOOF woof-woof woof woof-woof woof

Bertietaylor

--