Path: ...!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: shawn <nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: Cuomo Recants on Ivermectin
Date: Thu, 30 May 2024 15:05:48 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 48
Message-ID: <85jh5j55as32kh4jt2n07po7h7lnqcen06@4ax.com>
References: <7fqcnaOYXPhO48r7nZ2dnZfqnPadnZ2d@giganews.com> <v3a3do$1nurk$2@dont-email.me> <atropos-D790D2.09021830052024@news.giganews.com> <v3abh6$1p68a$2@dont-email.me> <_hGdnR09YZZiWsX7nZ2dnZfqnPSdnZ2d@giganews.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 30 May 2024 21:05:51 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="78e65926bdefb420c29692dbe3b7efb2";
	logging-data="1920217"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+eZfH2QwpMN1ZcF2XK5ie/25knEZmjyGM="
User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
Cancel-Lock: sha1:HjWMiORS00NMFufo62W6dnOVkI8=
Bytes: 3325

On Thu, 30 May 2024 18:39:59 +0000, BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:

>On May 30, 2024 at 10:03:33 AM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
>
>> On 5/30/2024 12:02 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>  In article <v3a3do$1nurk$2@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>>>  wrote:
>>>  
>>>>  On 5/29/24 3:15 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>  
>>>>>  Fired CNN anchor Chris Cuomo, who, along with the rest of the media,
>>>>>  mocked and derided anyone taking Ivermectin (remember how they called
>>>>>  it "horse paste"?) to treat the Wuhan Flu is singing a different tune
>>>>>  now.
>>>>> 
>>>>>  https://youtu.be/yYjH5g9ogXE?t=902
>>>  
>>>>  Yeah. He's not on CNN any more, and can be as crazy as he wants.
>>>  
>>>  LOL! It's hilarious how the Left considers these guys the sages of our
>>>  modern age until they say something to counter the Agenda, then they're
>>>  immediately branded batshit crazy and dismissed.
>>>  
>>>>  He just indicated that RFK Jr. should be at the debate.
>>>  
>>>  He should be if he has a significant amount of support.
>> 
>> The "significance" of RFK's support is that it could sink Biden, and not 
>> even remotely that it could elect RFK.
>
>"Bad for Biden" is not a reason to exclude a candidate from a debate.
>

No, but it is a reason why many may be glad he is excluded. If for no
other reason then it would take time away from the two candidates who
actually do have a real chance of being elected President of the USA.
What is a good reason to exclude him is if he can't reach the terms
required of the debate. I'm not sure what terms are in place now but
in the past I believe a candidate needed to be reaching around 15-16%
in various polls to be considered as a participant in the debates.
Something that RFK Jr isn't able to do.

My two cents is I would sort of like to have him in a real debate if
only to demonstrate some of his ideas to the populace. Which I would
think would either attract some of the weaker Trump supporters or
cause people to decide not to vote for RFK Jr. I know people talk
about him drawing support from Biden but I'm not that sure it would
happen if people saw more of RFK Jr.