Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<8634lx9na3.fsf@linuxsc.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: Command line globber/tokenizer library for C?
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2024 05:09:08 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 19
Message-ID: <8634lx9na3.fsf@linuxsc.com>
References: <lkbjchFebk9U1@mid.individual.net> <vbsmlb$3o6n2$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org> <vbsu1d$3p7pp$1@dont-email.me> <vbtj88$1kpm$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org> <vbujak$733i$3@dont-email.me> <vbum9i$8h2o$1@dont-email.me> <vbur72$99cr$1@dont-email.me> <20240912181625.00006e68@yahoo.com> <vbv4ra$b0hv$2@dont-email.me> <vbv6r1$bhc9$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org> <20240912223828.00005c10@yahoo.com> <861q1nfsjz.fsf@linuxsc.com> <20240915122211.000058b1@yahoo.com> <vcd05n$q3mn$1@paganini.bofh.team> <20240918024611.000002f3@yahoo.com> <867cb9agtd.fsf@linuxsc.com> <20240918110344.0000445c@yahoo.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Injection-Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2024 14:09:08 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="90f5f055cba32b807bf2e550ae581e94";
	logging-data="70624"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX180/zkth1DWlxJrXBe8gzV+tRuDbgluEM8="
User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.4 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:ZbiuiNdqsvkpVxAe4H55vxtiz1U=
	sha1:7H+WgEayoZLHefVNLBmBM7rLUwg=
Bytes: 2172

Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> writes:

> On Tue, 17 Sep 2024 18:31:10 -0700
> Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> wrote:
>
>> That's amusing. :)
>>
>> Do you know if icc will do tail call elimination for
>> the boring version of the code?
>
> Output of 'icc -O2' does recursive inlining to quite significant depth,
> so it is rather hard to follow.
> But it seems that the answer is "No".
>
> Anyway, by now icc is mostly of historical interest.
> They ceased independent compiler development 2-3 years ago and turned
> into yet another LLVM/clang distributor.

Thank you, that is good to know.