Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.nk.ca!rocksolid2!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (bertietaylor)
Newsgroups: sci.physics
Subject: Re: do you believe we can quantize =?UTF-8?B?Z3Jhdml0eT8=?=
Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2024 02:45:55 +0000
Organization: novaBBS
Message-ID: <864e5082b3abe264cfefec2571a9aad4@www.novabbs.com>
References: <j9oiptyjxgxi$.dlg@tomato.potato> <678b32e2a0eba553fdcf24b9489cc5d5@www.novabbs.com> <aflttk-b2682.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> <06a143affa77a528480f8fb55f650787@www.novabbs.com> <o0gvtk-5gba2.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> <171469a06dcc0b480244123ef80cb6c7@www.novabbs.com> <76c0uk-4rvb2.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> <96c8579ab960aa5997554af4cd2c3f7e@www.novabbs.com> <dji0uk-s68c2.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> <63005891cd240fd7b358b2d7e2b6244c@www.novabbs.com> <h782uk-56be2.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="2677545"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="4CIDjmRjWbqC4EEN5EcU+HA+pIaOwwy51Z63DnRPIoA";
User-Agent: Rocksolid Light
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
X-Rslight-Posting-User: d1111375bdddd1d0b42e6fbe96c9934b24d8a010
X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$ummA6HOmmHlsm8SnL9Pla.pFTbnBiaFLg7//7Sg5SNb4OIrGbVP/q
Bytes: 3886
Lines: 79

On Tue, 15 Oct 2024 13:44:51 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:

> Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 22:29:35 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
>>
>>> Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 20:40:09 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 12:39:22 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Sun, 13 Oct 2024 20:00:12 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> <snip old crap>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Having watched your videos I have to ask, what is it that you think is
>>>>>>>>> new in YOUR railgun in one sentence? Where is your math that shows it is
>>>>>>>>> anything new?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Heavy armature, very low voltage, very light weight.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Nothing new there whatsoever.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Keep on lying.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It is a new design
>>>>>>>> rail gun which proved Arindam's thesis that it has no reaction by easily
>>>>>>>> reproducible experiment. Which is the greatest science discovery of our
>>>>>>>> time.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yet you have no details, no instrumentation, no data and no analysis
>>>>>>> with error bars that prove anything.  Just crackpot ravings.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Keep on lying. What better to expect from racist bigots!
>>>>>
>>>>> Does your railgun have two parallel conductors connected to a DC power
>>>>> source?
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes, nothing new there.
>>>>
>>>> Did any other railgun design work in this manner?
>>>> Did any previous railgun design have manually portable low weight, low
>>>> voltage, and very heavy armature?
>>>>
>>>> NO
>>>
>>> Yes.
>>
>> Who did that, lying wretch?
>
> LOTS of people crackpot.
>
> Do a google search for DIY railgun and enjoy the thousands of hits
> crackpot.
>
>>>
>>>> This PARTICULAR railgun ***design*** IS A NEW INVENTION.
>>>
>>> Nope.
>>
>> Yes. No one did it before.
>
> No one did WHAT before crackpot?
>
>>>
>>> The mathmatics that describes how railguns work has been known for a
>>> long time.
>>>
>>> How is the mathmatics that describes how your railguns works any
>>> different crackpot?
>>
>> Penisnino that maths is beyond your scope.
>
> You have no math, Arindam, never had, never will because you are just a
> penis obsessed, arm waving crackpot.

tch tch, Penisnino should cool down, chant e-mcc at least 300000000
times on his rosary.