Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<864jaqwjx7.fsf@linuxsc.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> Newsgroups: comp.lang.c Subject: Re: Threads across programming languages Date: Tue, 21 May 2024 21:27:16 -0700 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 14 Message-ID: <864jaqwjx7.fsf@linuxsc.com> References: <GIL-20240429161553@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> <v0stic$325kv$3@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org> <v0svtn$32o8h$1@dont-email.me> <v0t091$32qj6$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org> <v0u90h$3c1r5$4@dont-email.me> <v0v28q$3ku1r$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org> <v105sc$3skqi$1@dont-email.me> <v10adm$3to7r$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org> <v124a6$drbu$1@dont-email.me> <v125f4$e2kl$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org> <v12a4e$f4f1$2@dont-email.me> <v12hf0$gtpa$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org> <20240503180102.00002f98@yahoo.com> <v13o0b$p9ih$4@dont-email.me> <v15s0l$1al59$1@dont-email.me> <v16o4t$1gbho$4@dont-email.me> <20240505123718.00000503@yahoo.com> <v1rnnq$32md5$1@dont-email.me> <20240513150450.00003030@yahoo.com> <v1t9fj$3h62p$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org> <v28l2q$2d8vg$2@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Injection-Date: Wed, 22 May 2024 06:27:16 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="ef527a1f0ace8b0bcb46bd1e68f4f6ae"; logging-data="1083171"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX185haa+tUgG7atT4u+mQF4EVUYqtwf8goY=" User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.4 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:P9f8o3h6ynB630NzEsuqZ0VzPSM= sha1:AI/OA5rxBq8UgVdq0sCjk+GnUUc= Bytes: 2335 Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> writes: > On Mon, 13 May 2024 16:52:36 +0200, Bonita Montero wrote: > >> If you target a certain platform relying on the compiler is the least >> problem. > > GCC is the closest we have to a de-facto-standard compiler, too. Perhaps true but not in its default mode. gcc -std=c99 -pedantic is very close to being standard C99, and similarly for -std=C90 and -std=C11 (in both cases with -pedantic). But gcc by itself, without any options and especially without -pedantic, is nowhere close to being a standard C compiler, de facto or otherwise.