Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2024 03:44:14 +0000
Organization: novaBBS
Message-ID: <8669d11f1a3b9adcd5f54f6240b96785@www.novabbs.com>
References: <dad338831baa98f3eb1ca50452fd9401@www.novabbs.com> <be051db4136835108537c9497c5dfab8@www.novabbs.com> <e766d5b3f2f87f9604f0937ad65a4284@www.novabbs.com> <3fddf5a7bc291abaf2bc49d856d87fcb@www.novabbs.com> <45ca134f20b357d137e34b1fcdd80764@www.novabbs.com> <2e6b6139cb2e4362bd998a0167d55429@www.novabbs.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="2599956"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="e/c594/k+DpN5wgh4wNSTzdRTGbv1jGbBBUwvKr4Q3Y";
User-Agent: Rocksolid Light
X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$GuoV2zbowXFVi76joyvGYOQufdZFN8gqpB4HIcCM/EsC7j1vL7tOi
X-Rslight-Posting-User: 429c285600844fd6252e8828c51a974f0457e863
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
Bytes: 2006
Lines: 17

Mr. Hertz: Then, they primarily relied on the clock readings at the
beginning and end of the experiment compared with the reference clocks,
allowing the possibility of errors at intervening intervals from various
causes. Thus, they lack the comparisons with reference clocks at each
significant interval that may be telling. It was, overall, a very
inaccurate experiment.

From my perspective, the question of alleged causation for SR and GR is
absurd.

Time dilation is illogical nonsense involving the reification fallacy,
so any result allegedly confirming it is pure chance, and knowing the
sociological factors in relativity, pure confirmation bias.

Gravitational effects on atomic clocks have nothing to do with
relativity.

Sorry, I can't offer more than that.