Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<868qnq4wu4.fsf@example.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!reader5.news.weretis.net!news.solani.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Richmond <dnomhcir@gmx.com> Newsgroups: comp.ai.philosophy Subject: Re: A conversation with ChatGPT's brain. Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2025 18:22:11 +0100 Organization: Frantic Message-ID: <868qnq4wu4.fsf@example.com> References: <868qnt8qfb.fsf@example.com> <vu5sdv$2iqbu$1@dont-email.me> <86v7qx77eq.fsf@example.com> <vub5b9$3f365$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: solani.org; logging-data="413139"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@news.solani.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:YuqEx+oDfhP9QCajKRjkJT9tOF8= sha1:NFJ8wxn9rSsjTVGHEFmOnsPyjbk= X-User-ID: eJwFwYkBwCAIA8CVipoUxuEx+4/gHTaN/R+CB4KmrXJhT7XodqnPxytqBUWmWipeBk5yWg86ShJm Bytes: 2257 Lines: 25 Doc O'Leary , <droleary.usenet@2023.impossiblystupid.com> writes: > For your reference, records indicate that > Richmond <dnomhcir@gmx.com> wrote: > >> ChatGPT-4o is nothing like Eliza, so you can't draw conclusions from >> one to the other. > > Again, that only speaks to how you think about chatbots. Personally, > every time I’ve tried a “modern” one out, the responses always made it > look *dumber* than Eliza, because it came across as trying to look > smarter than it really was. Like a kid bullshitting their way through > a book report by using bigger words than they really understood. I’ll > grant you that it *is* a much more sophisticated con job, but realize > that the output is still 100% “hallucinations” unless *you* know > otherwise. You are right, I was projecting. In fact ChatGPT even confirmed that I was projecting and that it was merely holding up a mirror to me. But I didn't notice hallucinations. It was contradicting itself in some ways, saying it was not self-aware but clearly knew what it was doing, i.e. predicting what likely responses would be. It also denies emotions but then expresses them. It was quite eerie. But then I start wondering how I know anyone is conscious, or how I know I am. I could be projecting consciousness onto people too.