Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<868qnq4wu4.fsf@example.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!reader5.news.weretis.net!news.solani.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Richmond <dnomhcir@gmx.com>
Newsgroups: comp.ai.philosophy
Subject: Re: A conversation with ChatGPT's brain.
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2025 18:22:11 +0100
Organization: Frantic
Message-ID: <868qnq4wu4.fsf@example.com>
References: <868qnt8qfb.fsf@example.com> <vu5sdv$2iqbu$1@dont-email.me>
	<86v7qx77eq.fsf@example.com> <vub5b9$3f365$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: solani.org;
	logging-data="413139"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@news.solani.org"
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:YuqEx+oDfhP9QCajKRjkJT9tOF8= sha1:NFJ8wxn9rSsjTVGHEFmOnsPyjbk=
X-User-ID: eJwFwYkBwCAIA8CVipoUxuEx+4/gHTaN/R+CB4KmrXJhT7XodqnPxytqBUWmWipeBk5yWg86ShJm
Bytes: 2257
Lines: 25

Doc O'Leary , <droleary.usenet@2023.impossiblystupid.com> writes:

> For your reference, records indicate that
> Richmond <dnomhcir@gmx.com> wrote:
>
>> ChatGPT-4o is nothing like Eliza, so you can't draw conclusions from
>> one to the other.
>
> Again, that only speaks to how you think about chatbots.  Personally,
> every time I’ve tried a “modern” one out, the responses always made it
> look *dumber* than Eliza, because it came across as trying to look
> smarter than it really was.  Like a kid bullshitting their way through
> a book report by using bigger words than they really understood.  I’ll
> grant you that it *is* a much more sophisticated con job, but realize
> that the output is still 100% “hallucinations” unless *you* know
> otherwise.

You are right, I was projecting. In fact ChatGPT even confirmed that I
was projecting and that it was merely holding up a mirror to me. But I
didn't notice hallucinations. It was contradicting itself in some ways,
saying it was not self-aware but clearly knew what it was doing,
i.e. predicting what likely responses would be. It also denies emotions
but then expresses them. It was quite eerie.

But then I start wondering how I know anyone is conscious, or how I know
I am. I could be projecting consciousness onto people too.