Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<86a5dakxmk.fsf@linuxsc.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED.mailhub.linuxsc.com!not-for-mail From: Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> Newsgroups: comp.lang.c Subject: Re: question about linker Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2024 06:33:39 -0800 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 26 Message-ID: <86a5dakxmk.fsf@linuxsc.com> References: <vi54e9$3ie0o$1@dont-email.me> <viasv4$nm7q$2@dont-email.me> <vibr1l$vvjf$1@dont-email.me> <vic73f$1205f$1@dont-email.me> <20241129142810.00007920@yahoo.com> <vicfra$13nl4$1@dont-email.me> <20241129161517.000010b8@yahoo.com> <vicque$15ium$2@dont-email.me> <vid110$16hte$1@dont-email.me> <vifcll$1q9rj$1@dont-email.me> <vifiib$1s07p$1@dont-email.me> <87ldwx10gv.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <vimtt4$27vv$1@dont-email.me> <vin7r2$49d1$2@dont-email.me> <vinalt$5qoh$1@dont-email.me> <vipgns$rjqn$1@dont-email.me> <viqbl8$12mum$1@dont-email.me> <viqfuh$131h8$2@dont-email.me> <87ttbj12ec.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <viqq95$164ug$1@dont-email.me> <87a5db0ymo.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="mailhub.linuxsc.com:45.79.96.183"; logging-data="1730095"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.4 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:TAKIwmq8UmaYeevC3QGISgpk1/4= Bytes: 2318 Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> writes: > Bart <bc@freeuk.com> writes: > >> On 04/12/2024 22:58, Keith Thompson wrote: >> >>> Bart <bc@freeuk.com> writes: >>> >>>> OK, if it's so simple, explain it to me. >>> >>> I'll pretend that was a sincere question. >> >> Let's put it this way: if somebody asked me what the rule was, I >> wouldn't be able to tell them. > > Probably because there's no single rule. As I wrote, "{" and "}" > are used in different contexts with different meanings. (So are > "(", ")", ";", and "static".) I have no particular expectation > that there should be a single rule covering all the cases, just > because they happen to use the same symbol. > > A reasonable person would have ackowledged that I've at least > tried to answer your question. For the record I appreciate your efforts to answer Bart's C questions.