Path: ...!news.roellig-ltd.de!open-news-network.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!reader5.news.weretis.net!news.solani.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Richmond <dnomhcir@gmx.com>
Newsgroups: comp.misc
Subject: Re: People Are Googling Fake Sayings To See AI Overviews Explain Them
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2025 18:01:52 +0100
Organization: Frantic
Message-ID: <86bjskgoov.fsf@example.com>
References: <vuebkb$2fgbi$1@dont-email.me> <86jz78h4in.fsf@example.com>
	<wwvikmsxph1.fsf@LkoBDZeT.terraraq.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: solani.org;
	logging-data="512289"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@news.solani.org"
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:+jQwj9vZhd9Vq7BT+pv0PUAIoVU= sha1:eQ335IDWH9abKngPfhLoKX25SVM=
X-User-ID: eJwFwQkBACAIBLBKvCfEQZD+EdxcwehjcJiv7xApxBJZb7kPNG4Y1UBmXIKj842hGlup+A5MEN8=
Bytes: 1859
Lines: 20

Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> writes:

> Richmond <dnomhcir@gmx.com> writes: > Lawrence D'Oliveiro
><ldo@nz.invalid> writes: >> Try it yourself. I put in “you can't make
>avocado without breaking >> legs”, and it came back with some
>paragraphs that began
>>
>> Is this a case of rubbish in, rubbish out? or ask a silly question,
>> get a silly answer.
>>
>> ChatGPT, by its own admission, holds up a mirror.
>
> I think a persistent bluffer is a good model for it. Sometimes right
> by luck, but very much not reliable for anything that matters.
>
> Most recently AI slop has created a new kind of supply chain attack:
>
> https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/ai-hallucinated-code-dependencies-become-new-supply-chain-risk/

Well I guess they didn't have a code review. Even human beings get it
wrong. I see GPT is well down the list.