Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<86bk6mo5lp.fsf@example.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!newsfeed.xs3.de!nntp-feed.chiark.greenend.org.uk!ewrotcd!news.eyrie.org!beagle.ediacara.org!.POSTED.beagle.ediacara.org!not-for-mail From: Richmond <dnomhcir@gmx.com> Newsgroups: talk.origins Subject: Re: Evidence v Conclusions Date: Sat, 06 Apr 2024 16:47:46 +0100 Organization: Frantic Sender: to%beagle.ediacara.org Approved: moderator@beagle.ediacara.org Message-ID: <86bk6mo5lp.fsf@example.com> References: <1tf21jdg30uru7c2ossq8j6ifrqdcefh0l@4ax.com> <86o7amocxq.fsf@example.com> <ecbdbe72b12496cecb6d807b77b50cd8@www.novabbs.com> <86frvyo80g.fsf@example.com> <481bea446c3d6f3930fed32d0a94e807@www.novabbs.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: beagle.ediacara.org; posting-host="beagle.ediacara.org:3.132.105.89"; logging-data="61799"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@beagle.ediacara.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux) To: talk-origins@moderators.isc.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:dmacR/J+hn2zaDcpAdf8fl2MPzQ= sha1:dWt/W4HOJMeSk0thILmJto2trCE= Return-Path: <news@reader6.news.weretis.net> X-Original-To: talk-origins@ediacara.org Delivered-To: talk-origins@ediacara.org id 56BCE22976C; Sat, 6 Apr 2024 11:47:55 -0400 (EDT) by beagle.ediacara.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1F6D1229758 for <talk-origins@ediacara.org>; Sat, 6 Apr 2024 11:47:53 -0400 (EDT) by moderators.individual.net (Exim 4.97) for talk-origins@moderators.isc.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (envelope-from <news@reader6.news.weretis.net>) id 1rt8Gr-00000002ukq-3YGf; Sat, 06 Apr 2024 17:47:57 +0200 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by pmx.weretis.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B03373E87A for <talk-origins@moderators.isc.org>; Sat, 6 Apr 2024 17:47:46 +0200 (CEST) id 76FD73E866; Sat, 6 Apr 2024 17:47:46 +0200 (CEST) X-User-ID: eJwFwYkBgDAIA8CV+JLIOC3K/iN4h6RzVAQLixVuMuzFhAz5qCJ7nSvTfpxTovk9jZZ34gf6ww/B Bytes: 3262 Lines: 28 j.nobel.daggett@gmail.com (LDagget) writes: > Richmond wrote: > >> j.nobel.daggett@gmail.com (LDagget) writes: > >>> That's quite false as there exist many different independent lines >>> of evidence for the existence of electrons beyond modeling the flow of >>> electricity. > >> Yes there are, but people often offer electricity, or worse still, >> television, as evidence. > >>> >>> Are you even aware of who JJ Thomson is? If so, do you understand > >> Oh it's you again. Are you even aware the standard model is a model? > > Cathode ray tubes don't produce models, they produce electron beams. > > The data interpretation doesn't require the standard model of particle > physics. Neither do slit experiments. What it looks like is there's > a lack of evidence that you understand either bit of evidence. Or have > ever seen that evidence? I'm guessing you never looked. I guess as > long as you play see no, hear no, speak no games, your > assertion will survive your personal belief system. What are you talking about you gormless fuckwit?