Warning: mysqli::__construct(): (HY000/1203): User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\includes\artfuncs.php on line 21
Failed to connect to MySQL: (1203) User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections
Warning: mysqli::query(): Couldn't fetch mysqli in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\index.php on line 66
Article <86cyk3xoqw.fsf@linuxsc.com>
Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<86cyk3xoqw.fsf@linuxsc.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: c initialization algorithm
Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2024 22:00:39 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 26
Message-ID: <86cyk3xoqw.fsf@linuxsc.com>
References: <vehee7$r8ri$1@dont-email.me> <20241013163050.897@kylheku.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Injection-Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2024 07:00:40 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="e06779884ea3dbf67bd7b93727715ea0";
	logging-data="1096577"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18tDDE30nwzm6/YpbAx355/2ItThoFiZao="
User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.4 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:ApnJu6G8zvLxwDY9dUPPVRInc+0=
	sha1:VrnnKzO/hmBUd6YMtqyY02oIHEE=
Bytes: 1684

Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> writes:

> On 2024-10-13, Thiago Adams <thiago.adams@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> The algorithm for C initialization as described in the standard
>> and implemented in gcc allow this.
>>
>> struct X{
>>      int a,b,c;
>> };
>>
>> int main()
>> {
>>      struct X x = {.a=1,2,3,.a=1, 2, 3};
>> }
>>
>> https://godbolt.org/z/7naedbEM6
>>
>> Basically, when a designed initializer is found the "cursor" goes
>> to that member and the following members are initialized in
>> order.
>
>  I do not suspect that therw is an observable order.  I.e. as
>  in a required order considered observable behavior.

Have you checked to C standard to see what it says about that?