Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder2.eternal-september.org!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: hertz778@gmail.com (rhertz)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: What composes the mass of an =?UTF-8?B?ZWxlY3Ryb24/?=
Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2024 02:54:30 +0000
Organization: novaBBS
Message-ID: <86d77396f97776369210b5993e4349c9@www.novabbs.com>
References: <a3b70d34ff5188e99c00b2cf098e783a@www.novabbs.com> <0253b1db2aee0a4c0dfb41950e302cd7@www.novabbs.com> <20a347faeb10dd0cb48e85552d21e70f@www.novabbs.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="536764"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="OjDMvaaXMeeN/7kNOPQl+dWI+zbnIp3mGAHMVhZ2e/A";
User-Agent: Rocksolid Light
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
X-Rslight-Posting-User: 26080b4f8b9f153eb24ebbc1b47c4c36ee247939
X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$957R9HBUcbanazM6mrrSquN66qxXfJf2IbLSdAuTrV1bUYG/X5aMm
Bytes: 3679
Lines: 59

On Sat, 2 Nov 2024 0:50:26 +0000, rhertz wrote:

> AS I WROTE BEFORE, THEY KNOW NOTHING!
>
> Best explanation: It exists, and we measured its mass. Ask me in 100
> years. Period.
>
>
> **********************************************
>
> https://www.quora.com/What-makes-up-the-mass-of-an-electron
>
> Andy Buckley
> Prof in particle physics, visiting researcher at CERN.
> Author has 376 answers and 842.4K answer views
>
> The particle physics answer is not far away from “it just is”. As far as
> we know, an electron is a fundamental particle with no internal
> structure, so its mass isn’t defined by the energy of a force field that
> binds it together (as is mostly the case for protons and neutrons).
>
> For somewhat arcane theory reasons, we cannot write down electron mass
> directly in the governing equations of the Standard Model but instead
> need to play a trick called the Higgs mechanism. This tells us that the
> electron gains its mass dynamically, by interacting with an omnipresent
> Higgs field. So mass is to some extent a measure of how much the
> electron field and the Higgs field like to talk to each other.
>
> And why does the electron like to talk to the Higgs field that much,
> while its heavier siblings the muon and tau talk to it a lot more? And
> it's much heavier cousins the bottom and top quarks apparently have it
> on speed-dial? We don’t know. Yet.
> ***************************************************

So, accordingly with the latest crap from particle physics, electrons
have no mass by themselves. Mass is "provided" by the Higgs field, even
when electrons are at rest.

This means that the rest energy of 0.511 MeV is provided by Higgs bosons
interacting with the electron. Therefore, the equation m = E/c^2 is pure
and absolute BULLSHIT!

But what remains unexplained is WHAT GIVES ELECTRONS A CONSTANT NEGATIVE
CHARGE, widely proven experimentally.

Or is it that the classic energy of the electron (E = e^2/R) is the real
rest energy of electrons, being R about 10E-18 meters?

I insist, particle physicists (all of them) KNOW NOTHING, but are stuck
with the fucking relativism and its incredible contradictions.

Why nobody take seriously the problem with the charge of the electron
and how such property collides with relativism?

Since the year 1900, it's known that m_e = (m_e/e) x e, as measured
and/or calculated by Thomson and Planck in that year.

124 years of darkness, created on purpose and to impose an agenda of
relativity, caused irreparable damage to physics, chemistry and
mathematics.