Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: "A diagram of C23 basic types"
Date: Mon, 05 May 2025 16:40:15 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 26
Message-ID: <86frhi4of4.fsf@linuxsc.com>
References: <87y0wjaysg.fsf@gmail.com> <slrnvv82gk.2aciv.candycanearter07@candydeb.host.invalid> <vt1a7f$i5jd$1@dont-email.me> <vti36r$g4nu$2@dont-email.me> <slrnvvqhmc.2eh69.candycanearter07@candydeb.host.invalid> <vtjknt$1sp26$1@dont-email.me> <vtk2f9$295ku$2@dont-email.me> <87cyde2vyf.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <vtk6es$2cj23$3@dont-email.me> <vtkjj6$2qmnt$1@dont-email.me> <vtkm8o$2u0tr$1@dont-email.me> <vtlp5v$3nrio$1@dont-email.me> <87tt6p11bw.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <vtmv30$tfkg$1@dont-email.me> <vtr8bd$vfa6$1@dont-email.me> <vtvkdk$vh8f$1@dont-email.me> <vu0b64$1jhpi$1@dont-email.me> <20250419231546.00006a20@yahoo.com> <vu633c$2oo5h$1@dont-email.me> <87h62h19xd.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <20250422010727.00007da4@yahoo.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Injection-Date: Tue, 06 May 2025 01:40:16 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="f84420402be78ce51ba0e8f0077f27e2";
	logging-data="1634369"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+9E5CnWP1qh3kVyL8aHeTHj14REAjJPJs="
User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.4 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:PX8voaNESPGFoZQLXKynTOG8hsI=
	sha1:vmMNp78c/fBCNhJxjhvC3KCI9Gk=

Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> writes:

> On Mon, 21 Apr 2025 14:28:30 -0700
> Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> writes:
>> [...]
>>
>>> I don't know enough about Thorium 229 nuclear resonances to be able
>>> to predict one way or the other.  Do you have a good reason or
>>> reference for your thoughts here?
>>
>> Can you PLEASE take this somewhere else?  (Or drop it, I don't care.)
>>
>> Don't read anything into the fact that I replied to one particular
>> participant in the thread.
>
> There are two types of usenet groups:
> - groups that suffer from significat amount of OT discussions
> - dead

I'm not sure I agree with that dichotomy, but even if I did,
there's a difference between an amount of OT traffic that is
merely annoying and the overwhelming floods of OT traffic that
take place far too often in comp.lang.c.  Every reduction
helps.