| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<86frlf4iye.fsf@linuxsc.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> Newsgroups: comp.lang.c Subject: Re: question about linker Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2025 18:48:41 -0800 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 21 Message-ID: <86frlf4iye.fsf@linuxsc.com> References: <vi54e9$3ie0o$1@dont-email.me> <vi9jk4$gse4$1@dont-email.me> <vi9kng$gn4c$1@dont-email.me> <87frnbt9jn.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <viaqh0$nm7q$1@dont-email.me> <877c8nt255.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <viasv4$nm7q$2@dont-email.me> <vibr1l$vvjf$1@dont-email.me> <vic73f$1205f$1@dont-email.me> <20241129142810.00007920@yahoo.com> <vicfra$13nl4$1@dont-email.me> <20241129161517.000010b8@yahoo.com> <vicque$15ium$2@dont-email.me> <vid110$16hte$1@dont-email.me> <87mshhsrr0.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <vidd2a$18k9j$1@dont-email.me> <8734j9sj0f.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <vihhkj$2er60$1@dont-email.me> <87bjxvqcv2.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <86mshcmeqn.fsf@linuxsc.com> <871pyoqlpb.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Injection-Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2025 03:49:18 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="5960255825c9d0bdcad81225e93c7e92"; logging-data="1386640"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+sVkaI+kEpNzYqhBjnRsi8ppvMX6df3aU=" User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.4 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:g+KJyoMYj+9za/aTIK4Fp1fLT4M= sha1:MsIUxEvJw9j2g5n5EOAB8BhpcRc= Bytes: 2546 Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> writes: > Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> writes: > >> Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> writes: >> >>> If someone wanted to ensure that all static functions defined in a >>> translation unit are declared near the top, there could be a separate >>> tool to generate, or at least check, the declarations. I'm not aware of >>> any such tool, which suggests there probably isn't much demand for it. >> >> What it suggests to me is that there are tools being used that >> you aren't aware of. > > What that suggests to me is that you feel the need to snipe without > sharing any actual information. I'm not sniping. I'm just making a statement about what the stated facts bring to mind, in my mind. You made a similar kind of statement. Is there some reason you think you should be entitled to do that and I should not be?