| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<86h630dqz2.fsf@linuxsc.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> Newsgroups: comp.lang.c Subject: Re: "A diagram of C23 basic types" Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2025 06:46:25 -0700 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 19 Message-ID: <86h630dqz2.fsf@linuxsc.com> References: <87y0wjaysg.fsf@gmail.com> <vsj1m8$1f8h2$1@dont-email.me> <vsj2l9$1j0as$1@dont-email.me> <vsjef3$1u4nk$1@dont-email.me> <vsjg6t$20pdb$1@dont-email.me> <vsjjd1$23ukt$1@dont-email.me> <vsjkvb$25mtg$1@dont-email.me> <vsjlkq$230a5$2@dont-email.me> <20250402232443.00003a7d@yahoo.com> <vslilm$8mfb$1@dont-email.me> <vsm05b$k0b7$1@dont-email.me> <20250403164437.00002c5a@yahoo.com> <vsm7m7$qoi5$2@dont-email.me> <vsmv5l$1mod5$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Injection-Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2025 15:46:35 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="58fc992bf3d49f6866b08a85a8ed3f48"; logging-data="4082776"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+Kz6os9Rb7if5qCTiPdjSgo5pxzGpbJT8=" User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.4 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:twBkq+8C68Yg+CDU5GNioGJcZEw= sha1:UN2Svvht7QMxMZEAUfZly6UckVI= Bytes: 1998 Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> writes: > On 03.04.2025 16:58, David Brown wrote: > >> [...] >> >> I know people can use pre-processor conditional compilation based on >> __STDC_VERSION__ to complain if code is compiled with an unexpected or >> unsupported standard, but few people outside of library header authors >> actually do that. I'd really like : >> >> #pragma STDC VERSION C17 >> >> to force the compiler to use the equivalent of "-std=c17 >> -pedantic-errors" in gcc. > > (I understand the wish to have that #pragma supported.) It never will be, for reasons that are quite obvious.