| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<86h6daddnb.fsf@linuxsc.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> Newsgroups: comp.lang.c Subject: Re: Baby X is bor nagain Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2024 01:43:20 -0700 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 21 Message-ID: <86h6daddnb.fsf@linuxsc.com> References: <v494f9$von8$1@dont-email.me> <20240625113616.000075e0@yahoo.com> <mUzeO.141609$Cqra.55051@fx10.iad> <v5elql$1jmii$1@dont-email.me> <m3BeO.24907$Gurd.16179@fx34.iad> <v5empd$1jndv$2@dont-email.me> <v5eph4$1k6a9$1@dont-email.me> <87ed8jnbmf.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <v5jhls$2m7np$1@dont-email.me> <v5jm32$2nqvp$1@dont-email.me> <v5k3v2$2qllm$1@dont-email.me> <v5kfst$2svt3$1@dont-email.me> <v5kmlm$2u918$1@dont-email.me> <20240627201830.854@kylheku.com> <v5m2nl$39qob$3@dont-email.me> <20240628032211.403@kylheku.com> <v5p4rv$3u92q$1@dont-email.me> <86le2ndajg.fsf@linuxsc.com> <v5pbn7$75a$1@dont-email.me> <v5ph1a$1bkv$1@dont-email.me> <20240629214944.00002cc4@yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Injection-Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2024 10:43:20 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="f8122076af5546f7640a872624b0271f"; logging-data="470565"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/YiLgc2yoaoVtT/oF5JpldvlRDTMYVeuc=" User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.4 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:lJQl5GrMBkam4WECLW38QVQH7dM= sha1:JbcAyi5ekWNV4+ODFroMr8/SN0M= Bytes: 2496 Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> writes: > On Sat, 29 Jun 2024 19:42:01 +0200 > David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> wrote: > >> gcc, however, is restricted and limited by its past - the developers >> do not lightly make changes that will result in compilation failures >> of code that previously compiled fine and had been tested to run >> correctly. Such changes - as made for gcc 14 - are only done after >> long discussion and long testing with existing code bases. > > Default input dialect of C language was changed (it seems, to gnu17) > before gcc14. May be, in gcc12. > BTW, finding out what dialect is a defaul is less than trivial. I think it isn't hard to find out what variation of the C language gcc takes in its default mode. More importantly though, one should always give an explicit -std= option, and specify which version of the language is desired. Anything less is just asking for trouble.