Path: ...!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++
Subject: Re: We have a new standard!
Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2024 18:06:59 -0800
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 42
Message-ID: <86jzbgbo70.fsf@linuxsc.com>
References: <C++-20241227154547@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> <cone.1735354270.316807.177566.1000@ripper.email-scan.com> <vkojb7$96o6$1@dont-email.me> <vkp50p$ce10$1@dont-email.me> <vkr4ve$sksr$1@dont-email.me> <vkrk4l$10d4e$1@dont-email.me> <vkshgh$1799g$1@dont-email.me> <20241230004450.0000202d@yahoo.com> <86seq5bete.fsf@linuxsc.com> <vku21r$1kbjn$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Injection-Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2024 03:07:00 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="e21c1894af35152a2f46a9d8fe234703";
	logging-data="2005220"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/3BO5kL+7jaWi4lvOm16vpOkKunvpXU0A="
User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.4 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:8giwhZ5YTXwNDj0iQ9sxL+bdSsM=
	sha1:TXv6ViMKa0iPq9Wa2Se/oFl+QJ8=
Bytes: 2967

boltar@caprica.org writes:

> On Mon, 30 Dec 2024 03:17:17 -0800
> Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> wibbled:
>
>> Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> writes:
>>
>>> On Mon, 30 Dec 2024 00:12:31 +0200
>>> Paavo Helde <eesnimi@osa.pri.ee> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 29.12.2024 15:51, David Brown wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> You can have an informed opinion about C++, and agree or disagree
>>>>> with the opinions of the committee members.
>>>>>
>>>>> But what you don't get to do - or at least, don't get to do if you
>>>>> want to be viewed seriously - is spout an /uninformed/ opinion.
>>>>> That's no more than mindless prejudice, and of no interest to
>>>>> anyone.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks David, for standing against the trolls.  It's a pity that
>>>> personal freedoms are often interpreted as "my ignorant opinion has
>>>> exactly the same worth as your expert knowledge".
>>>>
>>>> I'm all for personal freedoms, but my freedoms end where they might
>>>> hurt other people, or the nature for that matter.  Boasting ignorant
>>>> jumble can easily do that.
>>>
>>> It seems that Muttley@dastardlyhq.com still didn't figure out why
>>> stating strong opinion about something that you not just didn't learn
>>> in depth, but didn't even look at casually is less than optimal.
>>
>> For some time now I have simply stopped reading his comments.
>> I don't know why anyone bothers with him for more than a handful
>> of interactions.
>
> The same could be said about you.

I assume you mean that someone might have the same reaction to me
as you imagine I have to Muttley.  Note that I didn't say anything
about Muttley;  my comments were statements only about myself, not
about anyone else.