| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<86jzd2sl6y.fsf@linuxsc.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder2.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> Newsgroups: comp.arch Subject: Re: Memory ordering Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2024 17:28:21 -0800 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 11 Message-ID: <86jzd2sl6y.fsf@linuxsc.com> References: <vfono1$14l9r$1@dont-email.me> <vgm4vj$3d2as$1@dont-email.me> <vgm5cb$3d2as$3@dont-email.me> <YfxXO.384093$EEm7.56154@fx16.iad> <vh4530$2mar5$1@dont-email.me> <-rKdnTO4LdoWXKj6nZ2dnZfqnPWdnZ2d@supernews.com> <vh5t5b$312cl$2@dont-email.me> <5yqdnU9eL_Y_GKv6nZ2dnZfqn_GdnZ2d@supernews.com> <2024Nov15.082512@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> <vh7rlr$3fu9i$1@dont-email.me> <2024Nov15.182737@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Injection-Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2024 02:28:29 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="c7addf0a575b264d060ba5f0cab1431f"; logging-data="326954"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18LZOc65F5zUFK+sxzAuTyA+egcf9S2fl4=" User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.4 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:au4tjcSrKZAs0h52DVOOXZhh+98= sha1:RLVuA+IqA2iz/SZMNN9O44XfA0o= Bytes: 1700 anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) writes: > jseigh <jseigh_es00@xemaps.com> writes: > >> Anybody doing that sort of programming, i.e. lock-free or distributed >> algorithms, who can't handle weakly consistent memory models, shouldn't >> be doing that sort of programming in the first place. > > Do you have any argument that supports this claim. It isn't a claim, just an opinion.