Article <86jzfigolv.fsf@linuxsc.com>

Warning: mysqli::__construct(): (HY000/1203): User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\includes\artfuncs.php on line 21
Failed to connect to MySQL: (1203) User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections
Warning: mysqli::query(): Couldn't fetch mysqli in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\index.php on line 66
Article <86jzfigolv.fsf@linuxsc.com>

Deutsch English Français Italiano

<86jzfigolv.fsf@linuxsc.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com>
Newsgroups: comp.arch
Subject: Re: Computer architects leaving Intel...
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2024 09:08:12 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 17
Message-ID: <86jzfigolv.fsf@linuxsc.com>
References: <vaqgtl$3526$1@dont-email.me> <memo.20240830090549.19028u@jgd.cix.co.uk> <2024Aug30.161204@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> <86r09ulqyp.fsf@linuxsc.com> <2024Sep8.173639@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> <20240910114903.00003fff@yahoo.com> <861q1ring8.fsf@linuxsc.com> <20240910222702.000009a1@yahoo.com> <20240911022413.00007cbd@yahoo.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Injection-Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2024 18:08:12 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="6270473d9727e24675cb7c993eb45a62";
	logging-data="3859491"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+TCGP5yiB4QJdFRbehvt0k3uIIkGg8NIU="
User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.4 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:hEX0EMwQzQtIbp8co7/wfT7lYNE=
	sha1:Iujm5Nd197YDJmWm8vRkPxTMlGM=
Bytes: 1825

Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> writes:

> On Tue, 10 Sep 2024 22:27:02 +0300
> Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 10 Sep 2024 07:37:59 -0700
>> Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I should add that I appreciate your proposed solution;  it's
>>> better than what I think I would have come up with under a
>>> similar set of assumptions.
>>
>> Unfortunately, my solution is wrong and mistake is not even subtle.
>
> This one appears to work:  (src < dst+len) == (dst < src+len)

Yes.  This time I checked it. :)