Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<86jziliyws.fsf@linuxsc.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!feed.opticnetworks.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: Whaddaya think?
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2024 17:01:07 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 22
Message-ID: <86jziliyws.fsf@linuxsc.com>
References: <666ded36$0$958$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> <20240616015649.000051a0@yahoo.com> <v4lm16$3s87h$4@dont-email.me> <v4lmso$3sl7n$1@dont-email.me> <v4lr0m$3tbpj$1@dont-email.me> <8734pd4g3s.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <v4ltuj$3trj2$1@dont-email.me> <87ed8w3025.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <868qz4kty7.fsf@linuxsc.com> <v4olko$flpo$3@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Injection-Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2024 02:01:08 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="fa54ab77d267afe6c3d864a61670dc2b";
	logging-data="1657039"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18IzzaqO9BUaiKG64LlsYgQrb2t+sCqD2c="
User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.4 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:ZjB+uA6yE7a4dQstepdHVMZiXcg=
	sha1:s3C77tBpwZenkpDQbL/bqMYKu18=
Bytes: 2217

James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> writes:

> On 17.06.2024 07:40, Tim Rentsch wrote:
>
>> Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> writes:
>>
>>> The worst consequence of undefined behavior is having your code
>>> appear to "work".
>>
>> Personally I think causing a missle launch that started a
>> worldwide thermonuclear war would be a worse consequence.
>> YMMV.
>
> The standard doesn't say anything to prohibit such a consequence, but in
> real life such an outcome is possible only if your program is executing
> in an environment that allows it to send out launch messages to real
> missiles.  In such a context, a program that was intended to launch a
> missile strike, and seemed to do so, but actually failed to do so, would
> arguably be worse.  If the enemy knows that you are running such
> defective software, that enemy might not be deterred from attacking.

None of that has any relevance to my comment.