| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<86msbq2t5i.fsf@linuxsc.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> Newsgroups: comp.lang.c Subject: Re: Regarding assignment to struct Date: Mon, 05 May 2025 22:40:57 -0700 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 16 Message-ID: <86msbq2t5i.fsf@linuxsc.com> References: <vv338b$16oam$1@dont-email.me> <vv4j9p$33vhj$1@dont-email.me> <86plgo7ahu.fsf@linuxsc.com> <vv9hu7$3nomg$1@dont-email.me> <87o6w7h2wn.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <20250505120331.000015b2@yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Injection-Date: Tue, 06 May 2025 07:40:57 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="f84420402be78ce51ba0e8f0077f27e2"; logging-data="2337910"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+El3HW/cliF7KImQkeVxAdOcaaFeQTROU=" User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.4 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:CbrmZyiyq6hhP1/tFdvArBsNhMk= sha1:qhp0KH6ZovScJzAOyuAlCmoU7SI= Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> writes: > On Mon, 05 May 2025 01:34:16 -0700 > Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> wrote: > >> And more obviously, "%p" requires an argument of type void*, not >> int*. > > That part of otherwise very good comment is unreasonably pedantic. I don't have the same reaction. My sense is Keith was just being thorough. Speaking for myself his statement wasn't needed, but that condition might not hold for other readers. Given that his comment is just one not-overly-long sentence, I don't think it's too much to ask that readers already familiar with the point simply skip over it.