Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<86o6x5at05.fsf@linuxsc.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> Newsgroups: comp.lang.c Subject: Re: do { quit; } else { } Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2025 15:07:38 -0700 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 37 Message-ID: <86o6x5at05.fsf@linuxsc.com> References: <vspbjh$8dvd$1@dont-email.me> <8634enhcui.fsf@linuxsc.com> <vsph6b$ce6m$5@dont-email.me> <86ldsdfocs.fsf@linuxsc.com> <20250406161323.00005809@yahoo.com> <86ecy5fjin.fsf@linuxsc.com> <20250406190321.000001dc@yahoo.com> <86plhodtsw.fsf@linuxsc.com> <20250407210248.00006457@yahoo.com> <vt15lq$bjs0$3@dont-email.me> <vt2lp6$1qtjd$1@dont-email.me> <vt31m5$2513i$1@dont-email.me> <vt3d4g$2djqe$1@dont-email.me> <vt3iqh$2ka99$1@dont-email.me> <868qoaeezc.fsf@linuxsc.com> <vt3oeo$2oq3p$1@dont-email.me> <86mscqcpy1.fsf@linuxsc.com> <vt48go$35hh3$2@dont-email.me> <86iknecjz8.fsf@linuxsc.com> <vt4del$3a9sk$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Injection-Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2025 00:07:39 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="c14ed07d9aaf644daeab7c7dc464bfc3"; logging-data="1627431"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19GeWsRSWQLH6En/BepwQWlFmNB0DwWem4=" User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.4 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:wJZAVO22zt8nRKWwEDdcMbAHrlc= sha1:a7JU9UkZqdyh51QCWlWXD2r6KfI= Bytes: 3059 bart <bc@freeuk.com> writes: > On 09/04/2025 00:27, Tim Rentsch wrote: > >> bart <bc@freeuk.com> writes: >> >>>> If you want to make a point or ask a question about C code, >>>> SHOW THE CODE. And show all of it. Don't make people guess >>>> by showing only some of the code or by giving just a description. >>> >>> I'm showing the code but you keep snipping it! [...] >> >> No, I don't. Don't be so obtuse. I included the code I was >> originally commenting on, in my first followup. My comment about >> showing code was about your second posting. Let me repeat the two >> important paragraphs (quoted above) taken from that posting: >> >>>>> I get an incompatible error (from the example you snipped) even when I >>>>> remove both struct tags. >> >> The phrase "even when I remove both struct tags" describes code, it >> doesn't show the code. > > I showed this example a few lines later [in an earlier posting] > which has both struct tags omitted: There is a simple lesson that you need to learn: When someone is responding to a post, they are responding ONLY to the content in the posting they are responing to; not to some earlier posting in the same thread, not to a different posting submitted two weeks ago, not to what you meant to say but didn't, not to thoughts in your head but that you didn't say, but ONLY TO WHAT IS SAID IN THE POSTING BEING RESPONDED TO. If you can learn to follow this simple rule everyone in the newsgroup will be better off, including you.