| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<86o6yrowad.fsf@building-m.net> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!news.misty.com!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!panix!.POSTED.panix6.panix.com!nan.users.panix.com!robomod!not-for-mail From: John <john@building-m.simplistic-anti-spam-measure.net> Newsgroups: comp.sys.wearables Subject: Re: Welcome back! Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2025 16:44:29 EST Organization: Building M Approved: comp.sys.wearables Moderator <comp-sys-wearables-moderator@technomadic.org> Message-ID: <86o6yrowad.fsf@building-m.net> References: <m21pvpzi8t.fsf@technomadic.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: reader1.panix.com; posting-host="panix6.panix.com:166.84.1.6"; logging-data="14575"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@panix.com" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:bi5J2epI70QOZAJlZj8AvYRjuJM= X-CSW-Policy: https://www.livinginternet.info/u/mod_charter_or_FAQ/comp/comp.sys.wearables.txt X-CSW-Info-1: Send submissions to csw@nan.users.panix.com X-CSW-Info-2: Send complaints to comp-sys-wearables-moderator@technomadic.org X-Comment-1: The moderators do not necessarily agree or disagree with this article. X-Comment-2: Moderators do not verify the accuracy of posted information. X-Comment-3: Acceptance does not convey approval of any external references. X-Robomod: STUMP by ichudov@algebra.com (Igor Chudov), C++/Perl/Unix Consulting X-Moderation-1: See https://savannah.gnu.org/projects/stump X-Spam-Relay-Country: FR US X-Spam-DCC: sonic: mailcrunch1.panix.com 1255; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 Authentication-Results: mail2.panix.com; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=building-m.simplistic-anti-spam-measure.net Authentication-Results: mail2.panix.com; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=building-m.net Bytes: 4363 Lines: 53 Greg Pfeil <greg@technomadic.org> writes: > comp.sys.wearables has risen from the dead. > > My name is Greg Pfeil, and I was one of the CSW moderators back in the > day. With much help from the Usenet Big-8 Management Board > (https://big-8.org), this group (along with many others) is alive once > again. Nice! I'm going to take partial credit for this, as I had emailed the Big-8 MB some time back about finding a new moderator. Glad we got you back, instead! > In the 16 years since the last post to this group, wearable computing > has rapidly moved forward. Everything from smart watches, > heads-up displays, and of course, the pocket-sized devices that are so > much more powerful than the PC/104 half-cube I built in my dorm room > decades ago. > > But what exists outside of those spaces? What has the mainsteam industry > overlooked or gotten wrong? What wild thing have you built to address > some need that isn’t being satisfied elsewhere? Please share it here. There was an episode of Scientific American Frontiers years back which showed Steve Mann's students using their wearables (wired Twiddlers, hacked camcorder viewfinders) and it made an impression on my youthful brain, but it's only recently that all the right tech has been available off the shelf. I've been fiddling on and off over the last year or so with a very traditional wearable computer: head-mounted monocular display, Twiddler 3 chording keyset, Raspberry Pi 4 running on battery power. The whole thing is woven through a cheap vest, with the battery in one pocket, Pi in another pocket, cables run through the lining, etc. In this time I've seen a big surge in wearables *without* a display component. Cameras and voice commands are the big thing now. Acknowledging the value of having both hands free, I've implemented some basic voice control in my own wearable using Numen (https://git.sr.ht/~geb/numen) and a set of Bluetooth earbuds, and for some things it has definite advantages. As for cameras, I've found it challenging to find anything suitable for use with a Pi. I'd really like something that can clip to my lapel with Bluetooth control, but haven't found anything. I've also experimented with the Brillian Labs Monocle, and found it too limited to be of much use -- pathetic battery life, overly-obtrusive physical design, lame camera, tiny display. Their new Frame looks a little more interesting, but they've gone very heavily down the AI road and it's just not that interesting to me. john