Path: ...!3.us.feeder.erje.net!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!feeder1.feed.usenet.farm!feed.usenet.farm!aioe.org!y5+HOOoKIMtxjCZfPYnWgA.user.46.165.242.91.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Max <max@val.morgan>
Newsgroups: aus.legal
Subject: Re: transfer flight ticket
Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2022 09:48:04 +1100
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID: <t27vf4$1he3$1@gioia.aioe.org>
References: <t25oiv$1ajm$1@gioia.aioe.org> <op.1jxixjk6byq249@pvr2.lan>
 <t266nb$183q$1@gioia.aioe.org> <op.1jxt06kybyq249@pvr2.lan>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: gioia.aioe.org; logging-data="50627"; posting-host="y5+HOOoKIMtxjCZfPYnWgA.user.gioia.aioe.org"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@aioe.org";
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/91.7.0
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.2
Bytes: 2117
Lines: 34

On 1/04/2022 7:32 pm, Rod Speed wrote:
> Max <max@val.morgan> wrote
>> Rod Speed wrote
>>> Max <max@val.morgan> wrote
> 
>>>> Airlines say that you can't transfer your flight ticket to someone 
>>>> else.
> 
>>>  For a very good reason.
> 
>>>> Isn't this against the common law principle of things being invalid 
>>>> if they would be a 'restraint of trade' ?
> 
>>>  Nope. And there is no such common law principle.
> 
>> yes there is:
> 
> Bullshit there is.
> 
>> "In Australia the common law doctrine of restraint of trade continues 
>> to operate where it does not conflict with the Competition and 
>> Consumer Act 2010.
> 
> Bullshit.
> 
>> Briefly, the doctrine renders provisions which impose restrictions on 
>> a person's freedom to engage in trade or employment illegal and 
>> therefore unenforceable at common law unless reasonable, both in the 
>> interests of the parties and in the interests of the public."
> 
>> https://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/law/rot/index.html
> 
> Just because some fool claims something...

Are you saying you know more than the person that made that website?