Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: while(T[l]<p & l<=r)
Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2024 21:55:31 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 35
Message-ID: <86o7aj2kzg.fsf@linuxsc.com>
References: <uu109u$3798b$1@i2pn2.org> <uu3kqb$3i23g$1@dont-email.me> <kXeNN.99578$24ld.63941@fx07.iad> <86h6gnipqb.fsf@linuxsc.com> <uu9p7m$3icae$1@i2pn2.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Injection-Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2024 04:55:32 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="47558c70f7e061adbec47d824d7ff660";
	logging-data="40634"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+outj1Cu9YG8yxHM7Nx1T8kE6WBToyguo="
User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.4 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1://ivm69uqL775pkqpMYUJ9clsAI=
	sha1:pemVYAQXXGlex0DrzgULdLYYjhM=
Bytes: 2320

fir <fir@grunge.pl> writes:

> Tim Rentsch wrote:
>
>> scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) writes:
>>
>>> Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> writes:
>>>
>>>> On 27.03.2024 12:35, fir wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> tell me, is while(T[l]<p & l<=r) the same as while((T[l]<p)&&(l<=r))
>>>>
>>>> 1.  As long as K&R precedences still hold you don't need the inner
>>>> parentheses; '<' and '<=' has higher precedence than '&' and '&&'.
>>>
>>> While true, the parenthesis can be helpful to the reader
>>> and have no adverse effects.
>>
>> Certainly extra parentheses can be helpful to some readers.
>>
>> Considered as a question of fact, the proposition that extra
>> parentheses have no adverse effects is false.  It may be the
>> case that the adverse effects are thought to be unimportant
>> relative to some proposed benefit, but that is a question of
>> opinion rather than a question of fact.
>
> what a lamas you are ...
>
> its quite oposite it is using parenthesis and && instead of & and ||
> insetad | makes c source code lost its character - its generaly weird
> world that i noticed it recenty not 20 years ago

Can you explain how your comment has some relationship
to what it was that I said?  What is it that you think
I did say?