| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<86plgn65ff.fsf@linuxsc.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: Loops (was Re: do { quit; } else { })
Date: Sun, 04 May 2025 21:35:16 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 29
Message-ID: <86plgn65ff.fsf@linuxsc.com>
References: <vspbjh$8dvd$1@dont-email.me> <vtdh4q$b3kt$1@dont-email.me> <vtf7fe$1qtpg$1@dont-email.me> <vtgfuf$31ug1$1@dont-email.me> <20250413072027.219@kylheku.com> <vtgpce$39229$1@dont-email.me> <vti2ki$g23v$1@dont-email.me> <vtin99$vu24$1@dont-email.me> <vtiuf0$18au8$1@dont-email.me> <vtj97r$1i3v3$1@dont-email.me> <vtl166$36p6b$1@dont-email.me> <vtlcg0$3f46a$2@dont-email.me> <vtnekn$1fogv$1@dont-email.me> <vto2mb$20c4n$1@dont-email.me> <vtu4i5$3hteg$1@dont-email.me> <vtujko$3uida$1@dont-email.me> <hxOMP.335104$j2D.272394@fx09.iad>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Injection-Date: Mon, 05 May 2025 06:35:17 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="b2f20e442295d938e3644788cf940be7";
logging-data="3880418"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+LJ9mUBAQiTXJGSC8aoPBRVHCunBgxcVI="
User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.4 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:bxX6S5FTJBeXbvhQwRT0HZUKJGc=
sha1:0V+mfa1aXXUlkkZ3LXHNwskoH/Q=
Bytes: 2478
scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) writes:
> bart <bc@freeuk.com> writes:
>
>> On 18/04/2025 19:10, James Kuyper wrote:
>>
>>> On 16.04.2025 13:01, bart wrote:
>>> ...
>>>
>>>> Unlike C's for, which is just a gimmick where you bundle three
>>>> potentially unrelated expressions and hope for the best.
>>>
>>> If all you can do is "hope for the best", you're doing it wrong.
>>> It's your job to ensure that they are not arbitrary unrelated
>>> expressions, but correctly related expressions, and that's no
>>> different from your responsibility for all of the other
>>> expressions that make up your program.
>>
>> If you find that problematic, you shouldn't be programming in
>>
>>> any language, but certainly not in C.
>>
>> I see it didn't take you long to get to the personal insult. What
>> is it with this group?
>
> It's not an insult, it is a simple fact.
Any statement with the word "should" in it is a lot more likely
to be a statement of opinion than a statement of fact.