| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<86plhz5un5.fsf@example.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!reader5.news.weretis.net!news.solani.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Richmond <dnomhcir@gmx.com> Newsgroups: comp.misc Subject: Re: Truly Random Numbers On A Quantum Computer?? Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2025 22:39:26 +0000 Organization: Frantic Message-ID: <86plhz5un5.fsf@example.com> References: <vs73jc$3jepm$1@dont-email.me> <vs7a9c$3pg3k$1@dont-email.me> <86h63cys29.fsf@example.com> <vs9r3a$2ciql$5@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: solani.org; logging-data="570576"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@news.solani.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:JCsFTHbhp/nVcLalQAhOWpOSG3E= sha1:NI8JSinDhF2nOmoybzkkKXfqBLQ= X-User-ID: eJwFwQkRwEAIBDBLLH/lHDDrX0KTsERueUZ6MIgBJJ9Ubc+hd/0467YU4Nr6q6ehacpz1g8ajBD1 Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> writes: > On Sat, 29 Mar 2025 11:50:06 +0000, Richmond wrote: > >> Random is without a predictable pattern or plan. > > Let’s say I collect and store a sequence that meets your definition. Then > I play it back when you ask me for a random number sequence. Does it still > meet your definition? If not, what has changed? Because you have stored it, it is predictable by you and you have a plan. If I took some numbers from the square root of 2, maybe thousands of digits into it, and then presented them to you, to you they would be random because you wouldn't know where they came from or what the next digit in the sequence would be. But they aren't random, because I know and I can repeat them. I don't even need to store them.