Article <86plp5rmnl.fsf@example.com>

Warning: mysqli::__construct(): (HY000/1203): User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\includes\artfuncs.php on line 21
Failed to connect to MySQL: (1203) User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections
Warning: mysqli::query(): Couldn't fetch mysqli in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\index.php on line 66
Article <86plp5rmnl.fsf@example.com>

Deutsch English Français Italiano

<86plp5rmnl.fsf@example.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!news2.arglkargh.de!news.mixmin.net!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!reader5.news.weretis.net!news.solani.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Richmond <dnomhcir@gmx.com>
Newsgroups: comp.mobile.android
Subject: Re: whatsapp interoperability
Date: Sun, 15 Sep 2024 15:56:14 +0100
Organization: Frantic
Message-ID: <86plp5rmnl.fsf@example.com>
References: <lk16jsFrc4qU3@mid.individual.net>
	<lk3rldF97p4U1@mid.individual.net> <lk3rvcF85pkU3@mid.individual.net>
	<lk8tjgF2385U1@mid.individual.net>
	<36f0ejtie34qud3ldou260iibe376vb09s@4ax.com>
	<lkb807Fcnt4U1@mid.individual.net> <vbprmb$2i5i$1@solani.org>
	<lkdtifFp1taU1@mid.individual.net> <86r09pdqcp.fsf@example.com>
	<lklpbqFgepU2@mid.individual.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Injection-Info: solani.org;
	logging-data="306569"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@news.solani.org"
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:QiWelKDikzYxH14ZhhvO/DWRxdk= sha1:/uiVxxuVg9vfhbDxxx6DzGZiivo=
X-User-ID: eJwNyckBwDAIA7CZAtjAOA3H/iOk+grKw3IjaFjs5ngjs+3K8QiM3PFPU1nSs47oaHr8XdR+H60RKw==
Bytes: 1947
Lines: 16

"s|b" <me@privacy.invalid> writes:

> On Thu, 12 Sep 2024 13:11:02 +0100, Richmond wrote:
>
>> Given that you are communicating via SMS, would it be any worse to
>> communicate through an interoperability bridge without E2EE?
>
> Come again? I would have to set that up on my end (how?), but also at
> their end, right?

We're talking about the future. I expect Whatsapp will provide some kind
of API. If Signal decides to interoperate, which is a big if, then I
imagine it would be possible to send a message from signal to
<phonenumber>@whatsapp or something like that. I don't know why this
would be worse than sending an SMS, as SMS is typically received by
Google Messages, and then who knows what happens to the meta data, or
the message.