Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<86r02iicl3.fsf@linuxsc.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: Suggested method for returning a string from a C program?
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2025 10:54:16 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 14
Message-ID: <86r02iicl3.fsf@linuxsc.com>
References: <vrd77d$3nvtf$2@dont-email.me> <vrrvnh$176lu$1@dont-email.me> <vrs0j5$191gt$1@dont-email.me> <vrs2eu$176lu$2@dont-email.me> <vrs2r3$1b0ov$1@dont-email.me> <vrs7oi$1e2j7$1@dont-email.me> <vrtq62$2unrb$1@dont-email.me> <vru2t0$35frt$2@dont-email.me> <vrufju$3i02s$1@dont-email.me> <vrugmo$3ij4s$2@dont-email.me> <vrugut$3j3ah$1@dont-email.me> <vruma5$3mvbj$2@dont-email.me> <vs0gsh$1en04$1@dont-email.me> <20250326110011.634@kylheku.com> <vs25oi$2pqb$1@paganini.bofh.team> <QadFP.1351322$zz8b.870017@fx09.iad>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Injection-Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2025 18:54:18 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="3a6190fab936320ab0975276fac84019";
	logging-data="838525"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+2rOOQeUxC2a0sFhFFVxqhKaiPFgzdh7s="
User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.4 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:RuN3AbK0D2MqVvZZy6XwB+03leQ=
	sha1:ggPGMHSM9bGf6yacV5x21fgju6s=

scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) writes:

> [...]  I have one
> source file that takes almost 7 minutes to compile
> when using -O3 on a very-high-end xeon box.  Mostly
> buried in the overall compile time when using parallel
> make.
>
> The code could be restructured to compile in a few seconds;
> but that would require substantial changes to the rest
> of the codebase.   Compiling with -O0 for development
> testing reduces the compile time to a few seconds.

How long does it take compiling with -O1?