Path: ...!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++
Subject: Re: We have a new standard!
Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2024 03:17:17 -0800
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 30
Message-ID: <86seq5bete.fsf@linuxsc.com>
References: <C++-20241227154547@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> <cone.1735354270.316807.177566.1000@ripper.email-scan.com> <vkojb7$96o6$1@dont-email.me> <vkp50p$ce10$1@dont-email.me> <vkr4ve$sksr$1@dont-email.me> <vkrk4l$10d4e$1@dont-email.me> <vkshgh$1799g$1@dont-email.me> <20241230004450.0000202d@yahoo.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Injection-Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2024 12:17:17 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="2dc6d07a4213b43c753586a510244093";
	logging-data="1699313"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+J/CNsY46BefZji9MLfZusQNhFCz8a3J0="
User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.4 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:BQJxl0gt+andBEO0ywas+wHaAN0=
	sha1:I97rrWE9rAU5fRCOHo2UYhbSEU8=
Bytes: 2455

Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> writes:

> On Mon, 30 Dec 2024 00:12:31 +0200
> Paavo Helde <eesnimi@osa.pri.ee> wrote:
>
>> On 29.12.2024 15:51, David Brown wrote:
>>
>>> You can have an informed opinion about C++, and agree or disagree
>>> with the opinions of the committee members.
>>>
>>> But what you don't get to do - or at least, don't get to do if you
>>> want to be viewed seriously - is spout an /uninformed/ opinion.
>>> That's no more than mindless prejudice, and of no interest to
>>> anyone.
>>
>> Thanks David, for standing against the trolls.  It's a pity that
>> personal freedoms are often interpreted as "my ignorant opinion has
>> exactly the same worth as your expert knowledge".
>>
>> I'm all for personal freedoms, but my freedoms end where they might
>> hurt other people, or the nature for that matter.  Boasting ignorant
>> jumble can easily do that.
>
> It seems that Muttley@dastardlyhq.com still didn't figure out why
> stating strong opinion about something that you not just didn't learn
> in depth, but didn't even look at casually is less than optimal.

For some time now I have simply stopped reading his comments.
I don't know why anyone bothers with him for more than a handful
of interactions.