Path: ...!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!reader5.news.weretis.net!news.solani.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Richmond <dnomhcir@gmx.com>
Newsgroups: comp.ai.philosophy
Subject: Re: A conversation with ChatGPT's brain.
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2025 18:26:21 +0100
Organization: Frantic
Message-ID: <86v7qx77eq.fsf@example.com>
References: <868qnt8qfb.fsf@example.com> <vu5sdv$2iqbu$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: solani.org;
	logging-data="346764"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@news.solani.org"
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:B85KPSFwMI/IySd8rTp7FwbunMM= sha1:ivAzi3KqEFXRqcI82HGDyK0IKnY=
X-User-ID: eJwFwYEBwDAEBMCVKN5nnCL2HyF3YVB0OgIeG/tL+oWlmGwTn5gpeaRmhFDfCPZhTl34aD39QhBI
Bytes: 1510
Lines: 15

Doc O'Leary ,   <droleary.usenet@2023.impossiblystupid.com> writes:

> For your reference, records indicate that 
> Richmond <dnomhcir@gmx.com> wrote:
>
>> If ChatGPT didn't flatly deny that it is conscious, I think I would
>> assume it is conscious, as it is more convincing than some human beings
>> who don't seem to even know what consciousness means.
>
> That says more about you than it does about LLMs or the people you know.  
> It’s also nothing new:
>
> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ELIZA_effect>

ChatGPT-4o is nothing like Eliza, so you can't draw conclusions from one
to the other.