Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<86v7rviy6p.fsf@linuxsc.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> Newsgroups: comp.lang.c Subject: Re: Integral types and own type definitions (was Re: Suggested method for returning a string from a C program?) Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2025 08:55:26 -0700 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 23 Message-ID: <86v7rviy6p.fsf@linuxsc.com> References: <vrd77d$3nvtf$2@dont-email.me> <86r02roqdq.fsf@linuxsc.com> <vrh1br$35029$2@dont-email.me> <LRUCP.2$541.0@fx47.iad> <vrh71t$3be42$1@dont-email.me> <KFVCP.594649$SZca.498578@fx13.iad> <vrhb77$3frk8$1@dont-email.me> <vrru8f$174q6$1@dont-email.me> <86o6xpk8sn.fsf@linuxsc.com> <vrtmu4$2s1q2$1@dont-email.me> <20250325011327.41@kylheku.com> <20250325131110.000056bd@yahoo.com> <vruu75$3umpc$2@dont-email.me> <87a5987sh8.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <vrvb3o$aoc0$1@dont-email.me> <871puk7kae.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <vrvfp9$dob8$2@dont-email.me> <vs0fnp$1avlb$4@dont-email.me> <20250326160142.000051a6@yahoo.com> <vs13uu$1v9bj$1@dont-email.me> <20250326171612.00000a8d@yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Injection-Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2025 16:55:28 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="803a3f4dcc288e5d8bb72946dd0b4005"; logging-data="2194091"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/yYkxnzeVAiqN3CXvA2SowkxCzlY7Ggkc=" User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.4 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:0/3oQtWFhaesWzXvU5F/BAqxvNU= sha1:OStTCJCr3AImQNdlYha3NqrieXM= Bytes: 2439 Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> writes: > On Wed, 26 Mar 2025 14:45:50 +0000 > Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> wrote: > >> On 26/03/2025 14:01, Michael S wrote: >> >>> But your school in UK taught you the same meaning of 'whole >>> numbers' as James's school in US. >> >> What makes you think so? > > It seems, he said it himself in one of replies. > >> Mine certainly didn't. > > But you are significantly older than David. Not sure about James. Unfortunately the sub-conversation has turned into a debate about what the phrase "whole numbers" does or should mean. The important point is that different people understand it differently, and consequently "whole numbers" is not a good substitute for the word "integers".