Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<86v7rviy6p.fsf@linuxsc.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: Integral types and own type definitions (was Re: Suggested method for returning a string from a C program?)
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2025 08:55:26 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 23
Message-ID: <86v7rviy6p.fsf@linuxsc.com>
References: <vrd77d$3nvtf$2@dont-email.me> <86r02roqdq.fsf@linuxsc.com> <vrh1br$35029$2@dont-email.me> <LRUCP.2$541.0@fx47.iad> <vrh71t$3be42$1@dont-email.me> <KFVCP.594649$SZca.498578@fx13.iad> <vrhb77$3frk8$1@dont-email.me> <vrru8f$174q6$1@dont-email.me> <86o6xpk8sn.fsf@linuxsc.com> <vrtmu4$2s1q2$1@dont-email.me> <20250325011327.41@kylheku.com> <20250325131110.000056bd@yahoo.com> <vruu75$3umpc$2@dont-email.me> <87a5987sh8.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <vrvb3o$aoc0$1@dont-email.me> <871puk7kae.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <vrvfp9$dob8$2@dont-email.me> <vs0fnp$1avlb$4@dont-email.me> <20250326160142.000051a6@yahoo.com> <vs13uu$1v9bj$1@dont-email.me> <20250326171612.00000a8d@yahoo.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Injection-Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2025 16:55:28 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="803a3f4dcc288e5d8bb72946dd0b4005";
	logging-data="2194091"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/yYkxnzeVAiqN3CXvA2SowkxCzlY7Ggkc="
User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.4 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:0/3oQtWFhaesWzXvU5F/BAqxvNU=
	sha1:OStTCJCr3AImQNdlYha3NqrieXM=
Bytes: 2439

Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> writes:

> On Wed, 26 Mar 2025 14:45:50 +0000
> Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> wrote:
>
>> On 26/03/2025 14:01, Michael S wrote:
>>
>>> But your school in UK taught you the same meaning of 'whole
>>> numbers' as James's school in US.
>>
>> What makes you think so?
>
> It seems, he said it himself in one of replies.
>
>> Mine certainly didn't.
>
> But you are significantly older than David.  Not sure about James.

Unfortunately the sub-conversation has turned into a debate
about what the phrase "whole numbers" does or should mean.
The important point is that different people understand it
differently, and consequently "whole numbers" is not a good
substitute for the word "integers".