| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<871prysh1p.fsf@parhasard.net> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!news.roellig-ltd.de!open-news-network.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Aidan Kehoe <kehoea@parhasard.net> Newsgroups: sci.lang Subject: Re: King and Queen Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2025 09:56:18 +0100 Lines: 16 Message-ID: <871prysh1p.fsf@parhasard.net> References: <101mgep$3u80s$1@dont-email.me> <slrn103uf5n.30kf.naddy@lorvorc.mips.inka.de> <101on0k$ko7o$1@dont-email.me> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: individual.net sFzACfDZ3vpRylKLngw9BgFNbepyEN/yxaG+YhzgIegMxRiaur Cancel-Lock: sha1:P9hVR+QKYjjL96QtkeIB6/ZKa7Q= sha1:Q55aVuFcz1Ckl4vccD/t/GsYsvY= sha256:nSg+2h94UtMbrR2kebjA4MyaTrg4RrD6MGKuY2UxbHY= User-Agent: Gnus/5.101 (Gnus v5.10.10) XEmacs/21.5-b35 (Linux-aarch64) Bytes: 1526 Ar an ceathrú lá de mí Meitheamh, scríobh Ross Clark: > [...] Monarchs, then, can have spouses who do not reign. Could two people be > co-regnant? Wiliam III and Mary II, apparently, were co-monarchs > (1689-1694). I can't remember how that was worked out, though we heard about > it in high school. Or how William got to be "William III and II", as I just > read somewhere. Los Reyes Católicos (Ferdinand and Isabella of Spain) were, fairly famously, this. -- ‘As I sat looking up at the Guinness ad, I could never figure out / How your man stayed up on the surfboard after fourteen pints of stout’ (C. Moore)