Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<871pykekuj.fsf@librehacker.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Christopher Howard <christopher@librehacker.com> Newsgroups: comp.infosystems.gemini Subject: Re: Tables in Gemini Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2024 09:18:28 -0900 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 14 Message-ID: <871pykekuj.fsf@librehacker.com> References: <v7e2j2$31q1g$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2024 19:18:29 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="86e493898752b84d795f8fa0750782be"; logging-data="2593288"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18rpcg1Krjk+hD66h7SgY2OSuYcvCo+0ZA=" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cancel-Lock: sha1:2ffNJ5r6znu92JwJdfbAdbP7oSc= sha1:Gvu33dV9ElgcWEH2/2pOibnYgNI= Bytes: 1454 Namno <wed3009@yandex.ru> writes: My problem with table markup in gemini are conflicting goals: (1) You want something that is easy and intuitive to type by the user (2) You want something that still looks quite easy to read if the client just dumped markup straight to the terminal (3) You want a table format that involves minimal storage overhead of extra characters and that (maybe?) allows non-gemini clients to easily extract the data? It doesn't seem like the format you proposed is meeting these goals. -- Christopher Howard