Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<871q7j60ub.fsf@tilde.institute> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: yeti <yeti@tilde.institute> Newsgroups: news.software.readers Subject: Re: Free / opensource text-only reader for linux - suggestions, please? Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2024 20:37:40 +0042 Organization: Democratic Order of Pirates International (DOPI) Lines: 24 Message-ID: <871q7j60ub.fsf@tilde.institute> References: <353106c549c5267814e3e2c71aff0b10@www.novabbs.com> <slrnv0u6l4.ql4c.philb@ah61.eternal-september.org> <uuos5b$1co5f$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2024 19:55:42 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="12c8793f63764a7d1ef05d0195e78293"; logging-data="1665235"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/g87UcsI6W+WZUaWusfJTR" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:ZYRNpkW64z9KNh+uKrCk1A/gbq8= sha1:U0iS6MmN6Z7vS/Aps7uAnhiw83A= Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwCAAAAAByaaZbAAAAoElEQVRIx+2UUQvEIA yDv4z9/7+ce3DaKivjYE93BuykuiaURtjYeAfCADIgcEQLLMsCsK4zAI+1RIOxSVmOkhla7 cY+smffDzED132QhxQFgxAgKcp53YksSbk6vv2DJCkxq/dDSVVkfxd2cXD8p4GW+SEs43k8 blqZjNM/88RXbZUp654LhfLgPs2nZ2FfSLIWO1WSspnVHhZ63Nh4Gx9lkUsO9UXVygAAAAB JRU5ErkJggg== X-Face: ]_G&_b@O$RF(L7zT;DQ3-VU}c"F/_Mgy(4^P1,Tt^#0Cq+\qM&-h\&Z.3UuiwV")n~b;26e 5-s.cF/5tMdha-:]4eBHC9vBXnz4_aNe@d4oijVyix?>pC=tzuQhoD2A8P02+\xO4gNfRBE `B<kE3T-Gps_d0_6`+0W3E9{D Bytes: 2623 candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> writes: > I can't wait for "emacs" to be released as its own distro. I already thought some Lisp cycles about using emacs' package manager for own binaries too. "Own" as in "managing my $HOME", but I never tried to implement it. It shouldn't have been too complicated as many emacs "packages" already include C code that gets built at install time. But on bad days I think GNU is all about EEE. Embrace, extend, extinguish. Look at GCC: The GCCisms are so established now that even C no longer is the universal portable assembler. Far too much stuff can no longer be built using other compilers. Writing my stuff in Org/Babel is not a locked in syndrome of the GCC level. Org documents stay text and if all else fails, a human can read and understand that. I'm commuting between hating GNU and liking Org/Babel multipe times per day. -- I use BSDs, Linux, Haiku and other Emacs bootloaders.