Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org>
Newsgroups: sci.math
Subject: Re: How many different unit fractions are lessorequal than all unit
 fractions?
Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2024 07:01:48 -0400
Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID: <87292fe4478728480baf991c7d2562fc7d372ecf@i2pn2.org>
References: <vb4rde$22fb4$2@solani.org> <vcv4om$3a5lv$11@dont-email.me>
 <841bf27c18dffdc4ce0ea4d6392ccdfea2cef821@i2pn2.org>
 <vd19tt$3njbp$2@dont-email.me>
 <ac38f4a3b6d76f28c3acfec07c223f7a602b34f3@i2pn2.org>
 <vd1f6u$3od5s$6@dont-email.me> <f347fb8c-c754-4b7e-8e2e-b62135a9d351@tha.de>
 <vd7ad6$sv60$1@dont-email.me> <vdcavq$1rffd$4@dont-email.me>
 <vdckd8$1tg01$1@dont-email.me> <vdefaq$29746$4@dont-email.me>
 <c23e4e3d9dfa7eade32142279e48303fe9f65539@i2pn2.org>
 <vdhc48$2qovo$2@dont-email.me>
 <461bf21a7f094701b936484f17bd3d68211fcf81@i2pn2.org>
 <vdjcg0$11itj$2@solani.org>
 <5086a1e540cdfb8fd979d8eca95ab8123166bf54@i2pn2.org>
 <vdmo3e$3r2lg$1@dont-email.me>
 <63b03cafeddb7c5485f1a863d629f56dd10c5bc1@i2pn2.org>
 <8d9d2296-ea12-4aa1-9e62-03828b3e516e@tha.de>
 <d0e0bd47dfb0b199c64b4e05fe17315c6750471d@i2pn2.org>
 <vdp228$96hv$1@dont-email.me> <vdpcja$alvo$5@dont-email.me>
 <95c4443902896e8ec4c5a99289332800ee56d33b@i2pn2.org>
 <bab0b508-82ea-42c1-bcb5-af42ea8ff230@tha.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2024 11:01:48 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="665763"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="diqKR1lalukngNWEqoq9/uFtbkm5U+w3w6FQ0yesrXg";
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
In-Reply-To: <bab0b508-82ea-42c1-bcb5-af42ea8ff230@tha.de>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 2635
Lines: 20

On 10/5/24 5:18 AM, WM wrote:
> On 05.10.2024 00:45, Richard Damon wrote:
>> On 10/4/24 2:36 PM, WM wrote:
> 
>>> Points on the real line are real points. One is the first.
> 
>> Nope, and that is your problem, that property only hold at both ends 
>> for finite sets.
> 
> Every point is a finite set.
> 
> Regards, WM

And the set of *A* point has no "next" point, as it is just one.

In the infinite set of points, there is no "next" set to take from 
(since the reals, like the rationals are dense).

Sorry, you are just showing your utter stupidity and that your brians 
justification center has broken you as it tries to justify the errors 
created by your blown to smithereen logic system.