Warning: mysqli::__construct(): (HY000/1203): User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\includes\artfuncs.php on line 21
Failed to connect to MySQL: (1203) User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections
Warning: mysqli::query(): Couldn't fetch mysqli in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\index.php on line 66
Article <873530da43db3e0861f42ffa00aa68dd@www.novabbs.org>
Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<873530da43db3e0861f42ffa00aa68dd@www.novabbs.org>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!panix!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: mitchalsup@aol.com (MitchAlsup1)
Newsgroups: comp.arch
Subject: Re: Address bits again, Article on new mainframe use
Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2024 16:55:44 +0000
Organization: Rocksolid Light
Message-ID: <873530da43db3e0861f42ffa00aa68dd@www.novabbs.org>
References: <vb9r4g$2o1f$1@gal.iecc.com> <memo.20240904163805.19028V@jgd.cix.co.uk> <vbch08$1u12$1@gal.iecc.com> <vbioi5$1j26j$15@dont-email.me> <b51fd28e5d0eeeebf2844f875741beca@www.novabbs.org> <vbm610$2aolh$2@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="1440457"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="65wTazMNTleAJDh/pRqmKE7ADni/0wesT78+pyiDW8A";
User-Agent: Rocksolid Light
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$1JPfTPoGXwY6dimxkk6RKe2S4Cgne5mG1R.QOH63sKQfEWIlyzWVO
X-Rslight-Posting-User: ac58ceb75ea22753186dae54d967fed894c3dce8

On Mon, 9 Sep 2024 6:53:20 +0000, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:

> On Sun, 8 Sep 2024 00:45:05 +0000, MitchAlsup1 wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 7 Sep 2024 23:45:10 +0000, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, 5 Sep 2024 14:59:20 -0000 (UTC), John Levine wrote:
>>>
>>>> What I really wanted was relocatable segments I could load on demand
>>>> or paging, but that was a lot to ask of an 8088 or a real mode 286.
>>>
>>> The Burroughs machines had swappable segments, I gather. So the
>>> difference between segmentation and paging came down to: the address
>>> space is still linear, but segments are variable-length, and pages are
>>> fixed-length.
>>>
>>> It was soon generally agreed that fixed-length pages were easier to
>>> deal with.
>>
>> Largely because you could swap out part of a segment.
>
> I’m assuming you meant “couldn’t” ...

With pages you can swap parts of a segment (page at a time)
with segmentation (only) you cannot swap parts of the segment.