Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!news2.arglkargh.de!news.karotte.org!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: Annotated version of SRT
Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2022 08:00:52 +0200
Lines: 26
Message-ID: <jfr20fFbj24U2@mid.individual.net>
References: <jaaflrFde2kU1@mid.individual.net> <jdmdrlF5vtoU1@mid.individual.net> <59b45a30-48b0-430c-8910-fab1ff643051n@googlegroups.com> <jdp5sgFls44U1@mid.individual.net> <e5809d4b-1a2c-4e9b-be80-e17bb43a273en@googlegroups.com> <jduah6Flc3uU1@mid.individual.net> <52fe5433-4dcd-434c-905f-44e649e5b8f5n@googlegroups.com> <je11f5F6lumU1@mid.individual.net> <4e587415-9f7b-4ad9-b5ad-8a7b498ccef9n@googlegroups.com> <je55eoF9taU1@mid.individual.net> <0787f688-0032-4f81-ac37-398fb4bcd077n@googlegroups.com> <jem70uF86f1U1@mid.individual.net> <dbcc7c29-8ee5-4f53-9b0e-002f3d0e7846n@googlegroups.com> <jeotkoFo21kU1@mid.individual.net> <62891654$0$18737$426a74cc@news.free.fr> <jeu01hFmv1tU1@mid.individual.net> <1c56796c-3e1b-4bdb-875c-284e040f75d5n@googlegroups.com> <jfj2feFnr5jU1@mid.individual.net> <t74luh$ohd$1@dont-email.me> <jfods7Foo2jU1@mid.individual.net> <62974563$0$18398$426a34cc@news.free.fr> <a284e166-8dcf-4706-924f-50fc391710bbn@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net dKWYaUBjLS2BTwK4JWtlywTtOwxJGR+xJNPaaVarnC6EhBHddp
Cancel-Lock: sha1:mJXCy7Z8pSIrlZdQtRMN5eFIXRU=
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0
In-Reply-To: <a284e166-8dcf-4706-924f-50fc391710bbn@googlegroups.com>
Bytes: 2656

Am 01.06.2022 um 14:38 schrieb Maciej Wozniak:
> On Wednesday, 1 June 2022 at 12:54:30 UTC+2, Python wrote:
>> Thomas Heger wrote:
>> ...
>>> Instead of that, I received tons of insults, which had almost no
>>> connection to the text or my critique.
>> This is a blatant, shameful lie Thomas
>
>
> Oh, stinker Python is opening its muzzle again,
> and trying to pretend he knows something.
> Tell me, poor stinker, what is your definition of
> a "theory" in the terms of Peano arithmetic?
> See: if a theorem is going to be a part of a theory,
> it has to be formulable in the language of the
> theory. Do you get it? Or are you too stupid even for
> that, poor stinker?
>

I do not see any conncetion of your comment to the topic of our discussion.

So, please, could you be so kind and explain, how you relate 'Peano 
arithmetic' to SRT?


TH