| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<874j383n8h.fsf@example.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Salvador Mirzo <smirzo@example.com> Newsgroups: comp.unix.questions Subject: Re: xterm rlwrap sbcl Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2024 13:00:30 -0300 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 89 Message-ID: <874j383n8h.fsf@example.com> References: <87frmtofu3.fsf@example.com> <vjdufn$20g9u$1@dont-email.me> <vjeke1$24hao$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2024 17:00:31 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="752c9c2a49550cd354fc63395edef8c0"; logging-data="4102702"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+OY0D5wDLhH/gd3GBFrm1sL2bHoS2DCxQ=" Cancel-Lock: sha1:NiG3SDvHT+eknm0PauO5SHdh+Gk= sha1:fGrqP64TsJFG9njZ7G3cYfjyLJA= Bytes: 3320 Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> writes: > On Thu, 12/12/2024 1:05 AM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote: >> On Wed, 11 Dec 2024 22:22:28 -0300, Salvador Mirzo wrote: >> >>> $ echo $TERM >>> xterm >> >> Same here. >> >>> I really am running PuTTY on Windows and logging in to a FreeBSD system. >> >> I am running KDE Konsole on Linux to access a local shell. >> >>> Of course, I typed >>> >>> (format t "hello~%") >>> >>> but we end up seeing >>> >>> (f(format t "hello~%") >> >> My terminal window shows: >> >> * (format t "hello~%") >> hello >> NIL >> >>> If I type >>> >>> (write-string "hello") >>> >>> we end up with >>> >>> * (w(write-string "hello") >>> hello >>> "hello" >> >> My terminal window shows: >> >> * (write-string "hello") >> hello >> "hello" >> >> Most likely suspect: Windows is the weakest link. >> > > This is the easiest thing I could wire up as a simulation > for those at home. Since I don't know a thing about LISP, > I can't very well address that part of the problem. > > [Picture] > > https://i.postimg.cc/9FVtm0S5/putty-ssh-session-overview.gif > > The $TERM declaration and the color capability, > don't exactly match in my copy of PuTTY. The distortion > seen by the OP does not look like wrongly emitted > color codes, which could make more of a mess. > PuTTY is not declaring "xterm-256color" as the term type. > > [Picture] > > https://i.postimg.cc/QMtZRXsc/putty-settings.gif I believe this is a FreeBSD thing. Using the same PuTTY and the same Windows, but loging in on a GNU Debian system, I don't see any problems: --8<-------------------------------------------------------->8--- %uname -a Linux kontesti.me 6.2.9-x86_64-linode160 #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Wed Apr 5 15:30:32 EDT 2023 x86_64 GNU/Linux %sbcl --version SBCL 1.2.4.debian %echo $TERM xterm %rlwrap sbcl This is SBCL 1.2.4.debian, an implementation of ANSI Common Lisp. More information about SBCL is available at <http://www.sbcl.org/>. SBCL is free software, provided as is, with absolutely no warranty. It is mostly in the public domain; some portions are provided under BSD-style licenses. See the CREDITS and COPYING files in the distribution for more information. * (format t "hello~%") hello NIL --8<-------------------------------------------------------->8---