Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<875xtn8fch.fsf@bsb.me.uk>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Ben Bacarisse <ben@bsb.me.uk>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: Baby X is bor nagain
Date: Wed, 03 Jul 2024 01:54:38 +0100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 40
Message-ID: <875xtn8fch.fsf@bsb.me.uk>
References: <v494f9$von8$1@dont-email.me> <20240625113616.000075e0@yahoo.com>
	<mUzeO.141609$Cqra.55051@fx10.iad> <v5elql$1jmii$1@dont-email.me>
	<m3BeO.24907$Gurd.16179@fx34.iad> <v5empd$1jndv$2@dont-email.me>
	<v5eph4$1k6a9$1@dont-email.me> <87ed8jnbmf.fsf@bsb.me.uk>
	<v5jhls$2m7np$1@dont-email.me> <v5jm32$2nqvp$1@dont-email.me>
	<v5k3v2$2qllm$1@dont-email.me> <v5kfst$2svt3$1@dont-email.me>
	<v5kmlm$2u918$1@dont-email.me> <20240627201830.854@kylheku.com>
	<v5m2nl$39qob$3@dont-email.me> <87msn1l3e5.fsf@bsb.me.uk>
	<v5udks$13tjn$1@dont-email.me> <87bk3flty5.fsf@bsb.me.uk>
	<v61789$1mme1$1@dont-email.me> <87bk3f8hy5.fsf@bsb.me.uk>
	<v625m8$1rn2r$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Injection-Date: Wed, 03 Jul 2024 02:54:39 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="91547590b01ff16af44327f627e0520c";
	logging-data="1950078"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18tRFyI6lBczUx0MriyOtc5Pk7yboOYQvg="
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:/tx9/AWSu1Muew7dwMBgC9f99+w=
	sha1:lN6rmx7F0/A4y6CsKOOZ3RI3YrU=
X-BSB-Auth: 1.5d8930a177a7c7b36b24.20240703015438BST.875xtn8fch.fsf@bsb.me.uk
Bytes: 3024

bart <bc@freeuk.com> writes:

> On 03/07/2024 00:58, Ben Bacarisse wrote:
>> bart <bc@freeuk.com> writes:
>> 
>>> On 02/07/2024 16:00, Ben Bacarisse wrote:
>>>> bart <bc@freeuk.com> writes:
>>>>
>>>>> On 01/07/2024 13:09, Ben Bacarisse wrote:
>>>>>> bart <bc@freeuk.com> writes:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Using products like tcc doesn't mean never using
>>>>>>> gcc. (Especially on Linux
>>>>>>> where you will have it installed anyway.)
>>>>>> The parenthetical remark is wrong.
>>>>>
>>>>> You mean it is possible for a Linux installation to not have gcc
>>>>> preinstalled?
>>>> I mean that saying "on Linux ... you will have it installed anyway" is
>>>> wrong.
>>>>
>>>>> Sure, although in the dozen or two versions I've come across, it
>>>>> always has been.
>>>> I'm not sure what you mean by a "version".  Every version (in the sense
>>>> of release number) of a source-only Linux distribution will have gcc
>>>> installed, but is that all you mean?  Source-only distributions are rare
>>>> and not widely used.
>>>
>>> No I mean binary distributions (unless the install process silently
>>> compiled from source; I've no idea).
>> Which ones?
>
> I really, really don't remember.

"[I]n the dozen or two versions I've come across, it always has been".
So you can't remember even one of the dozen or two versions you've come
across?  How long ago did you last come across a version of Linux?

-- 
Ben.