Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<875xtzp9vl.fsf@bsb.me.uk>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Ben Bacarisse <ben@bsb.me.uk>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: Baby X is bor nagain
Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2024 23:33:34 +0100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 20
Message-ID: <875xtzp9vl.fsf@bsb.me.uk>
References: <v494f9$von8$1@dont-email.me> <v4pddb$m5th$1@dont-email.me>
	<20240618115650.00006e3f@yahoo.com> <v4rv0o$1b7h1$1@dont-email.me>
	<20240618184026.000046e1@yahoo.com> <v4sd75$1ed31$1@dont-email.me>
	<877celzx14.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com>
	<v4u85k$1t2pu$2@dont-email.me> <v4ucmn$1u14i$1@dont-email.me>
	<v4v2br$22c0m$1@dont-email.me> <v4v5nu$230rh$2@dont-email.me>
	<v4vfrn$24rv6$1@dont-email.me> <v50n9s$2fkko$1@dont-email.me>
	<v50poh$2g4ha$1@dont-email.me> <87iky3svqh.fsf@bsb.me.uk>
	<874j9nxsdy.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <874j9ns382.fsf@bsb.me.uk>
	<86h6dlhb34.fsf@linuxsc.com> <8734p3rjno.fsf@bsb.me.uk>
	<v59bhe$ch8p$1@dont-email.me> <86zfrbfsd6.fsf@linuxsc.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Injection-Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2024 00:33:34 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="2fe2b5b522b691828527b639c59887b1";
	logging-data="584944"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX197bS6vLy+RJcBqdSw9fF41S3g5rcP+keo="
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:hlaWYhNSLcxsFifVdTdbYPUXUU8=
	sha1:S3Y+WDeurrnTHQBiHFuF1/3LmuA=
X-BSB-Auth: 1.8c082f7c2f43bc9a64a0.20240623233334BST.875xtzp9vl.fsf@bsb.me.uk
Bytes: 2282

Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> writes:

> James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> writes:
>
> [on the requirements for qsort]
>
>> I certainly would favor improved wording that made this clearer.
>> In fact, simply explicitly mandating total ordering rather than
>> making a vague comment about consistency would probably be the
>> best approach.
>
> Clearly the C standard intends to impose a weaker requirement
> than that the comparison function be a total ordering.

The plot thickens.  Unless, of course, you are referring to the
distinction you drew before between an ordering of all possible objects
and only those in the array.

-- 
Ben.