Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<877c2uhj9l.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: Regarding assignment to struct
Date: Mon, 05 May 2025 13:53:10 -0700
Organization: None to speak of
Lines: 13
Message-ID: <877c2uhj9l.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com>
References: <vv338b$16oam$1@dont-email.me> <vv4olm$388j7$1@dont-email.me>
	<vv9u4v$46n9$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Injection-Date: Mon, 05 May 2025 22:53:11 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="ce0368853eba606cbaed4ff885db219e";
	logging-data="1343581"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18JqCbhkSISa9M2zMxAYSTo"
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:AOW7jaJ4LITBL54UAVHXIc3Mhps=
	sha1:ClRNyogAIYqYb+O7xlXR4ZN3Z6I=

Muttley@dastardlyhq.com writes:
[...]
> If you twant o pass an actual array to a function instead of a pointer to it,
> embedding it in a structure is the only way to do it. 

Yes, but that's not necessarily useful.  An array that's a member
of a struct can only be of a constant length (unless it's a flexible
array member, but that doesn't help).  Functions that work with
arrays typically need to deal with arrays of arbitrary length.

-- 
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com
void Void(void) { Void(); } /* The recursive call of the void */