From: Cor <cornews@clsnet.nl>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp
Subject: Re: Editor of choice
Organization: Clsnet Linux Systems
References: <878qzs5bgk.fsf@gmail.com> <87plt3kxbm.fsf@yaxenu.org>
Date: Fri, 31 May 2024 15:03:25 +0000
Message-ID: <878qzq2fcy.fsf@clsnet.nl>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:LRL3k9w47BYDiKIpeYM8aR09tKA=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!newsfeed.hasname.com!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feed.abavia.com!abe005.abavia.com!abp002.abavia.com!news.kpn.nl!not-for-mail
Lines: 21
Injection-Date: Fri, 31 May 2024 17:47:04 +0200
Injection-Info: news.kpn.nl; mail-complaints-to="abuse@kpn.com"
Bytes: 1250

Some entity, AKA Julieta Shem <jshem@yaxenu.org>,
wrote this mindboggling stuff:
(selectively-snipped-or-not-p)

> steve <sgonedes1977@gmail.com> writes:

>I still use the GNU EMACS.


Which 'other' editor?

The use of any other editor is concidered pennance by te church of EMACS



-- 

	Any marginally usable programming language approaches an ill
       defined barely usable re-implementation of half of common-lisp.
       'Paraphrased