Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<87a591xi52.fsf@mothra.hsd1.ma.comcast.net>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Radey Shouman <shouman@comcast.net>
Newsgroups: rec.bicycles.tech
Subject: Re: Helmet efficacy test
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2025 12:46:33 -0400
Organization: None of the above
Lines: 54
Message-ID: <87a591xi52.fsf@mothra.hsd1.ma.comcast.net>
References: <vs751k$3k5eb$1@dont-email.me>
	<87o6xkmwqn.fsf@mothra.hsd1.ma.comcast.net>
	<5rteuj1mr9a65enuv3jqj7sfmpgurreaqs@4ax.com>
	<vs92mm$1j1nq$2@dont-email.me> <m4qvduFb17oU1@mid.individual.net>
	<p83hujhub0kjjqbldnkenuod55mq8uu4nt@4ax.com>
	<vsa9hq$2ret2$1@dont-email.me>
	<fackujprf51nqihig9d1020qjr4gabi77s@4ax.com>
	<hulkujd5jj5uidnhdeochn6646br6hbbo6@4ax.com>
	<0e4lujdqfu1mdqarrvacdetdm2ba2vaouc@4ax.com>
	<ib8lujlljikprqc67o73ei1u1ilf9fai0u@4ax.com>
	<m4vnu9F3sbrU1@mid.individual.net>
	<3tbluj1v3sqpaneuomej7lvjf9crei2evr@4ax.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Injection-Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2025 18:46:36 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="d953c05f42d50874b33a5dab3f444fea";
	logging-data="783022"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+InazUslpFDqThHKRjoAB7kgTTNrMRS3s="
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:Ldo9NvlJC7yJX3CQkqzYjfZw43A=
	sha1:Igun0RZVl9PMTDJ0FCYwZo4hwlo=
Bytes: 3286

Catrike Ryder <Soloman@old.bikers.org> writes:

> On 31 Mar 2025 14:42:17 GMT, Roger Merriman <roger@sarlet.com> wrote:
>
>>Catrike Ryder <Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:
>>> On Mon, 31 Mar 2025 15:06:32 +0200, Wolfgang Strobl
>>> <news51@mystrobl.de> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Am Mon, 31 Mar 2025 04:57:32 -0400 schrieb Catrike Ryder
>>>> <Soloman@old.bikers.org>:
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> In my opinion, the biggest problem bike helmets cause is "do gooders"
>>>>> on either side of the issue telling "others" what they should or
>>>>> shouldn't do and the "others" not ignoring the "do gooders."
>>>> 
>>>> In actual fact, one of the bigger problems caused by bicycle helmets are
>>>> laws that force cyclists to wear those bicycle helmets. Those enforcing
>>>> these laws don't care about your opinion stated above. 
>>> 
>>> That would be do gooders at work. Here in the states those helmet laws
>>> are getting fewer and fewer. I have no problem with helmet laws for
>>> children because I believe it's a society/government responsibility to
>>> look after children.
>>> 
>>> --
>>> C'est bon
>>> Soloman
>>> 
>>
>>Putting barriers to children cycling which a helmet is, is very unlikely to
>>be for the common good, quite the opposite.
>>
>>The risk factors for kids are much the same as adults ie motorists which is
>>well beyond what a bike helmets is designed for.
>>
>>US seems to have number of essentially car centric regulations, see Jay
>>walking to Helmet laws and various bike regulations.
>>
>>Roger Merriman
>
> I don't believe helmets are barriers to children cycling. My grandkids
> never complained, but now ride without helmets.

I saw my niece and nephews decide not to ride their bikes when their
mother told them they had to wear helmets, because it was the law.


> --
> C'est bon
> Soloman

--