Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<87a5bgsnql.fsf@gmail.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Alexis <flexibeast@gmail.com> Newsgroups: comp.lang.c Subject: Results of survey re. a new array size operator Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2025 17:57:22 +1100 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 19 Message-ID: <87a5bgsnql.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2025 07:57:23 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="ee5c9e998bd599113136363cb63bc44e"; logging-data="2230181"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18Mphf8EMhYhnI44My3fDoYl/v6B7ixRJQ=" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cancel-Lock: sha1:yoRd+RcJ/wOplqGEmMOEKWixXZk= sha1:FG1X3e8hO3S/qFzo3qDOLcopf5k= Bytes: 1732 Hi all, JeanHeyd Meneide, a Project Editor for WG14, has just posted the results of a survey re. the preferred form of a new array size operator: "There is a clear preference for a lowercase keyword, here, though it is not by the biggest margin. One would imagine that with the way we keep standardizing things since C89 (starting with _Keyword and then adding a header with a macro) that C folks would be overwhelmingly in favor of simply continuing that style. The graph here, however, tells a different story: while there’s a large contingency that clearly hates having _Keyword by itself, it’s not the _Keyword + stdkeyword.h macro that comes out on top! It’s just having a plain lowercase keyword, instead." -- https://thephd.dev/the-big-array-size-survey-for-c-results Alexis.