Path: ...!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Ben Bacarisse <ben@bsb.me.uk>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: Top 10 most common hard skills listed on resumes...
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2024 00:08:27 +0100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 25
Message-ID: <87bk1buduc.fsf@bsb.me.uk>
References: <vab101$3er$1@reader1.panix.com> <vafim7$1ubg8$1@dont-email.me>
	<vah4hr$2b9i8$5@dont-email.me> <vahngt$2dtm9$1@dont-email.me>
	<87r0abzcsj.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <vai1ec$2fns2$1@dont-email.me>
	<874j75zftu.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <valrj7$367a8$2@dont-email.me>
	<87mskwy9t1.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <vanq4h$3iieb$1@dont-email.me>
	<875xrkxlgo.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <vapitn$3u1ub$1@dont-email.me>
	<87o75bwlp8.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <vaps06$3vg8l$1@dont-email.me>
	<871q27weeh.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <20240829083200.195@kylheku.com>
	<87v7zjuyd8.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <20240829084851.962@kylheku.com>
	<87mskvuxe9.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <vaqefq$2arg$2@dont-email.me>
	<87h6b3uejz.fsf@bsb.me.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Injection-Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2024 01:08:28 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="eebafb89c0a8b9905bd58ebf99ea830d";
	logging-data="180995"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+WSI6r37eVfLhYRuFSazIMba2XN9ab6eA="
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:akVxl5Ub3D4jE2Zb6pACHvMdj4w=
	sha1:35wuMdJCy4UVINQo93Li4qIb/I0=
X-BSB-Auth: 1.55f894924c5e8c5637e6.20240830000827BST.87bk1buduc.fsf@bsb.me.uk
Bytes: 2660

Ben Bacarisse <ben@bsb.me.uk> writes:

> James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> writes:
>
>> On 8/29/24 12:06, Ben Bacarisse wrote:
>> ...
>>> I can't see what it is you object to in what I wrote.  I don't disagree
>>> with anything you are saying (the "correct result" being to reject a
>>> program that has, syntactically, the wrong thing on the left hand side).
>>
>> No - the only requirement is that a diagnostic be produced. A fully
>> conforming implementation of C is allowed to accept such code and then
>> generate an executable; if you choose to execute the executable, the
>> behavior is undefined.
>
> Sorry, I used a term incorrectly.  To put it informally, you must be
> told that "this is not C".  Not everything is C even if a C compiler
> will accept FORTRAN code as an extension.

Actually I don't think I did.  I said "reject" and a compiler that says
"this is not C" and then generates a executable is rejecting the code as
far as I am concerned.

-- 
Ben.