Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.nk.ca!rocksolid2!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: Call to Repeal the Physical Theories of the 20th Century
Date: Wed, 28 May 2025 19:14:21 +0000
Organization: novaBBS
Message-ID: <87ce5635ccd022f8b35cfd5282c4f88a@www.novabbs.com>
References: <ac14f42212a2c46b9c73571d4bffee9c@www.novabbs.com> <044281a23bf5ae6be87d87da9ff44793@www.novabbs.com> <6f8fe47495233b563af9843bca0b5323@www.novabbs.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="2317466"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="HcQFdl4zp4UQRQ9N18ivMn6Fl9V8n4SPkK4oZHLgYdQ";
User-Agent: Rocksolid Light
X-Rslight-Posting-User: a2f761a7401f13abeefca3440f16b2f27b708180
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$t7jZvU437CWsDS6JkCgRDOJlrpmsvBrlMrCSmoWkObs8mbWj3IW3S
Bytes: 3334
Lines: 39

On Mon, 19 May 2025 11:54:13 +0000, rhertz wrote:

> On Mon, 19 May 2025 3:42:07 +0000, LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote:
>
>> "We often hear the argument that the justness of application of
>> quantum mechanics lies in the great accuracy of its math calculations.
>> But in fact, the quantum mechanics so as was the Ptolemay epicycles
>> is a procedure for finding of mathematical construction to the existing
>> experimental data which this mathematics has to arrive at. We can
>> always find the mathematical relationships that describe experimental
>> data or, if not, we can construct a new mathematics to describe the
>> experimental data. But finding such mathematical constructions
>> (theories) do not confirm the veracity of the basic physical principles
>> (models) upon which these construction are based."
>
> Like SR and Lorentz applied to particle accelerators. It's A FACT that
> SR has been "validated" in linear and circular CHARGED particle
> accelerators, but ONLY to speeds lower than 0.3 c. From this limit up to
> near c, the calculations are made BASED ON THE DETECTED ENERGY OF
> CHARGED PARTICLES.
>
> Physics DENY the fact that are dealing with CHARGED PARTICLES, and that
> the energy transfer between accelerators and particles could be limited
> JUST by the speed at which the EM electric fields can accelerate
> particles. It's highly possible that such action IS NOT RELATED TO SR,
> but to limits at which accelerating energy can be transferred to
> particles, in a way that formulae ARE SIMILAR TO THOSE FROM SR.
>
> To mention the above possibility is considered heretic in the physics
> community, which is married to relativity like devote socialists or
> communists are married to the concepts of POPULISM. Every thing else is
> just FAR RIGHT. That's the way the world has been functioning for the
> last 140 years (politics and economy).
Right, by the energy as discussed by the Argentinian professor J.J.H.
SAMRA (LA PLATA National University, Argentina) in his article, "COSMIC
RAYS VELOCITIES EXCEED CONSIDERABLY THE SPEED OF LIGHT (c): Firm
evidence of the Newtonian constancy of Length, Time and Mass."

It is silly that they try to accelerate particles faster than c using
EM.